Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT112 S4 Q5 Explanation

In a poll of eligible voters conducted

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In a poll of eligible voters conducted on the eve of a mayoral election, more of those polled stated that they favored Panitch than stated that they favored any other candidate. defeated Panitch by a comfortable margin.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Each of the following, if true, contributes to a resolution of the discrepancy

Answer choices

  1. Correct70% picked this

    Of Yeung’s supporters, a smaller percentage were eligible to vote than the percentage of Panitch’s supporters who

    Why this is right

    Our job here, "Given that Panitch was leading in the poll, how did Yeung win the election?" This answer says, "Yeung won because a smaller percentage of his supporters were eligible to vote." That's counterintuitive. Having a smaller group of your supporters be eligible to vote would help you lose, not win.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Helps Explain13% picked this

    A third candidate, Mulhern, conducted a press conference on the morning of the election and

    Our job here, "Given that Panitch was leading in the poll, how did Yeung win the election?" This answer says, "Yeung won because a third candidate dropped out, and (so all their voters switched to Yeung)." For example, say in the 2020 election, it was Trump vs. Biden vs. Andrew Yang They do a poll and ask people the night before the election, "who's your favorite candidate". The results: 40% - Trump 35% - Biden 15% - Yang 10% - others, combined That makes it seem like Trump will win. But if Yang realizes he has no chance and drops out the morning of the election (publicly, via press conference), then Yang voters will have to decide whether to vote for Biden or Trump, and that could make a previous underdog like Biden still win the election by a large margin. Naturally, this answer doesn't tell us that Mulhern voters defected to Yeung once they learned their candidate was no longer running, but it creates the opportunity to tell that story, which still can help explain the discrepancy.

  3. Helps Explain4% picked this

    The poll’s questions were designed by staff members of

    Our job here, "Given that Panitch was leading in the poll, how did Yeung win the election?" This answer says, "Yeung lost the poll because it was rigged by Panitch's campaign. Yeung was, in reality, more popular among the electorate. But since the poll was designed by members of Panitch's campaign, they structured it so that people would be more inclined to say favorable things about their preferred candidate". That's why survey didn't match election: survey was biased towards Panitch. Again, this answer only provides the suggestive foundations for such a story, but that's still better than what the correct answer is does (provide foundations for the opposite story).

  4. Helps Explain4% picked this

    Of the poll respondents supporting Yeung, 70 percent described the election as “important” or “very important,” while 30 percent of respondents

    Our job here, "Given that Panitch was leading in the poll, how did Yeung win the election?" This answer says, "Yeung won the election because her voters actually showed up to the polls. Panitch's voters just responded to the poll but they flaked on election day because only 30% of them considered the election important." Survey didn't match election because survey didn't account for likelihood of whether that person would actually vote.

  5. Helps Explain8% picked this

    The poll, conducted on a Monday, surveyed persons in the downtown area, and the percentage of Yeung’s supporters who work downtown is

    Our job here, "Given that Panitch was leading in the poll, how did Yeung win the election?" This answer says, "Yeung lost the poll because it was taken in a potentially unrepresentative area of town, which bends towards Panitch supporters. If they had polled out in the suburbs and rural areas, they probably would have encountered a lot more Yeung voters." Survey didn't match election because survey's sample was unrepresentative of the overall city.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free