Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT105 S1 Q15 Explanation

Jessica: The budget surplus should

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Jessica: The budget surplus should be used only to increase government payments to unemployed.

Marcie: A better use of the money would be for a public works create jobs.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

On the basis of their statements, Jessica and Marcie are committed to disagreeing about the truth of which

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Disagreement Relative vs. Absolute14% picked this

    Using the budget surplus to increase government payments to those who are unemployed is putting the

    We can probably infer that Jessica would agree with this, but can we infer that Marcie would say, "using surplus money to give more assistance to the unemployed is not putting this money to a good use"? No, we know she thinks that using it for a public works project would be better, but that doesn't mean that the worse option (giving it to unemployed) is a bad option. That would be using relative language in the stimulus to support absolute language in the answer.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    The public deserves to have jobs created when there are many people

    Out of Scope: public deserves Both Probably Agree This language does center around where surplus money should / shouldn't be spent. It's about what the public does / doesn't deserve, which neither of them talked about. To the extent that their ideas are "give money to the unemployed vs. create jobs (for the unemployed)", it seems like they're both sympathetic towards the idea of helping the unemployed.

  3. Too Strong: usually13% picked this

    When there is a choice between increasing payments to the unemployed and funding a public works project, the

    Neither person's statements provide support for this claim about how money should usually be spent. They're only speaking to this current budget surplus.

  4. Unsupported Disagreement0% picked this

    Creating jobs through a public works project will ultimately benefit

    This isn't very tempting because the language is about whether or not new jobs would benefit the public, whereas we're looking for where budget surplus money should / shouldn't be spent. Marcie would probably agree with this answer, but can we support that Jessica thinks, "Creating jobs through a public works project will not ultimately benefit the public"? No, she says nothing about public works and so we have no support that she would be this pessimistic about its chances of benefiting the public.

  5. Correct71% picked this

    There is a better way to use the budget surplus than increasing government payments to

    Why this is right

    Marcie would agree; she says a better way would be for a public works project that would create jobs. Jessica would disagree; she says the only way the surplus money should be used is increasing payments to the unemployed. (This answer gives Person 2's position, while using the language mostly from Person 1)

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free