Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT105 S1 Q14 Explanation

If an artist receives a public

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

If an artist receives a public subsidy to support work on a specific project—e.g., making a film—and if this project then proves successful enough to allow the artist to repay the subsidy, is the artist morally obliged to do so? The answer is clearly yes, since the money returned to the source of support for other artists deserving of public subsidies.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following principles, if established, most helps to justify the conclusion

Answer choices

  1. Bad Conclusion Match21% picked this

    An artist has a moral duty to urge deserving fellow artists to try to obtain public subsidies, especially if those artists' projects

    This argument isn't trying to say that successful artists have a moral duty to urge fellow artists of anything. It's saying that successful artists have a moral duty to repay the subsidy.

  2. Bad Conclusion Match9% picked this

    A financially successful artist should acknowledge that financial success is not solely a function

    This argument isn't trying to say that successful artists should acknowledge something. It's saying that successful artists should repay the subsidy.

  3. Correct66% picked this

    A subsidy should be understood as creating a debt that, though routinely forgiven, is rightly forgiven only if either the debtor is unable to

    Why this is right

    They really went to great lengths to make this answer awful. Let's cut through the warm-up fluff that is meant to distract us from the functional conditional rule we're getting with the "only if". Only if = right side, Necessary indicator If ... Then ... subsidy debt debtor can't repay rightly forgiven ? or creditor not interested in repayment Our author is concluding, "successful artists are morally obliged to pay back their subsidies", so we would want to contrapose this rule so that the right side better matches the conclusion. If ... Then ... debtor can repay and subsidy debt creditor is interested ? is not in repayment forgiven This matches the argument well. The evidence talked about artists whose success would allow them to repay, so the debtor (the recipient of the subsidy) is able to repay. The creditor (the agency distributing the subsidies) will welcome that money returned to the agency, so the creditor is interested in repayment. So we can trigger the rule, and that gets us closer to our Conclusion, by saying the successful artist's debt is not forgiven. They do owe that money back.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unrelated to Goal3% picked this

    The provider of a subsidy should judge as most deserving of subsidies those whose projects are most likely

    We're looking for a principle that says that the recipient of a subsidy should repay it. This is a principle that's talking about how the provider of a subsidy should allocate money.

  5. Unrelated to Goal0% picked this

    An artist requesting a subsidy for a potentially profitable project should be required to make a reasonable effort to

    We're looking for a principle that says that the recipient of a subsidy should repay it. This is a principle that's talking about how the applicant for a subsidy should have already tried to get a bank loan first.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free