The dwarf masked owl, a rare migratory bird of prey, normally makes its winter home on the Baja peninsula, where it nests in the spiny cactus.
Conclusion (so)
If we don't take steps to reestablish the spiny cactus population, the dwarf masked owl will not make its home on the Baja peninsula this winter.
Evidence
Last spring, a blight destroyed all the spiny cacti on the peninsula, and that's the only suitable nesting site for the dwarf masked owl on the peninsula.
Evaluate
Because the conclusion is Conditional, we might want to think about a Missing Link assumption. The conclusion is trying to achieve this logic path:
Don't try to no owl reestablish ------------------------> on BP this SC population winter
The evidence told us that, no SC ----> no suitable nesting site
So the argument the author is trying to make seems to be this:
Don't try to no no suitable no owl reestablish --> SC ---> nesting ---> on BP this SC population site winter
The author is assuming a link from 1 to 2, and assuming a link from 3 to 4:
(1 to 2): . Maybe that's wrong. Maybe the spiny cactus will grow back on its own even if we don't take any steps to reestablish it.
(3 to 4): Maybe that's wrong. Maybe the owl will still make its home on the Baja peninsula this winter and just skip laying eggs. Or maybe it will make its home on the BP but find a suitable nesting site a short fly away.
Goal
Look for an answer establishing either of the missing links, or look for an answer defending against a potential objection (an objection should allow us to argue that even if we don't do anything to reestablish the spiny cactus population, the dwarf masked owl might still make its home on the Baja peninsula this winter).