Reading Comprehension

PT9 · S1 · P1 · Q6 Digital Photography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Many argue that recent developments in electronic technology such as computers and videotape have enabled artists to vary their forms of expression.

Topic

The relationship between new technologies and the arts—how technological developments impact artistic expression and creativity.

Framework

Present Debate (with elements of Answer/Explain)

Main Point

While some worry that technology undermines traditional artistic creativity, in reality, technology has historically expanded and refined artistic possibilities rather than diminishing them. **The Most Valuable Sentence:** (end of P2)

P1: New Technologies Expand Artistic Possibilities

The passage opens by explaining that new technologies, like computers and video devices, give artists more options for creative expression by adding new dimensions to older art forms rather than replacing them. An example is provided with the use of the SteadicamTM in dance films, which allows for shots and preservation previously impossible.

P2: Concerns About Technology Subverting Art

The second paragraph introduces the opposing viewpoint: some people think technology can actually hurt art by making it less spontaneous and potentially eliminating live performances. However, the author pushes back, suggesting this mindset is unnecessarily negative and that technology has always helped creative expression.

P3: Historical Example—Photography and Impressionist Painting

The final paragraph supports the author’s optimism with a historical example. When photography was invented, it changed how people appreciated art and inspired Impressionists to experiment with perception and spontaneity. Photography also freed painters from portrait-making, encouraging moves toward abstraction and modern art.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would agree with which one of the following statements regarding changes in painting since the nineteenth century?

The artistic experiments of the
Out of Scope: applying methods elsewhere
The idea of painters applied portrait methods to other subject matter isn't discussed in the last paragraph. We just heard that, "since cameras can handle portraits, now painters can spend their time on other subject matter".
12% picked this
The nineteenth-century knowledge of light
Unsupported Causal Relationship
We heard that, "since cameras can handle portraits, now painters can spend their time on other subject matter, which thus gave rise to the abstract creations of modern art". This isn't saying anything about "knowledge of light and movement" giving rise to abstract creations. It's just saying, "now that we don't have to spend our time making portraits, we can spend our time developing new styles of art". We were told that Degas used his new understanding of light and movement to more accurately capture reality, not to make abstract stuff.
37% picked this
Once painters no longer felt
Too Strong: exclusively
This captures the gist of the final sentence, but turns up the volume way too much. We know that "painters had more freedom to vary their subject matter, which gave rise to abstract creations". But we can't say that they turned exclusively to abstract stuff. And we never actually talked about abstract portraits.
1% picked this
Once painters were less limited
Unsupported Causal Relationship
If this answer started by saying, "Once painters were less limited by an obligation to paint portraits ...", then it would be fine. Instead, it's acting like there was a causal relationship between "leaving Impressionism" and experimenting with abstract act. Nothing in the last paragraph ever suggests that these painters became less limited to the Impressionist style.
15% picked this
Correct
Once painters painted fewer conventional
Why this is right
This is a meaning match for the final sentence. Abstract art is nonrepresentational. It isn't designed to represent a specific thing or person. We were told in the final sentence that because photography preempted painting as a way of getting portraits, painters had more freedom to vary subject matter, which gave rise to abstract creations. So that captures the idea that once they were freed from portrait duty, they had more chance to try abstract stuff (which moves beyond a literal depiction).
Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
36% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free