Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT6 S2 Q1 Explanation

A law that is not consistently enforced

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A law that is not consistently enforced does not serve its purpose. Law without enforcement is not law; it is merely statute—a promise of law. To institute real law is not merely to declare that such and such behavior is forbidden; it is also to punish those who violate that edict. Furthermore, to enforce law but to engage in the arbitrary and unjust exercise of power.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

The main point of the passage is that instituting real law

Answer choices

  1. Too Broad3% picked this

    the exercise of

    The passage discusses the misuse of power when enforcement is biased, but not the mere exercise of power in itself. Real law will involve the exercise of power, as the transgressors need to be punished, but this is too broad to capture the main point, because the author specifies proper vs. improper exercises of power.

  2. Too Weak17% picked this

    authorizing the enforcement of

    The passage discusses enforcement, not just authorizing enforcement of punishments. It implies something beyond the mere authorization — actual, consistent, and fair enforcement.

  3. Correct73% picked this

    the unbiased punishment of prohibited

    Why this is right

    This matches the core message of the passage regarding unbiased and fair punishment as essential to the real institution of law. A very clear connection to the unbiased enforcement and punishment of prohibited behavior.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Assumption-Bait6% picked this

    understanding the purpose of

    While understanding the purpose of law might be inferred as important, the passage predominantly highlights the necessity of fair enforcement, not just purpose understanding.

  5. Assumption-Bait1% picked this

    clearly defining unacceptable

    Although defining unacceptable behavior is an element of law making, the passage focuses more on the law's enforcement rather than its definition.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free