Millions of irreplaceable exhibits in natural history museums are currently allowed to decay. Yet without analyses of eggs from museums, the studies linking pesticides with the decline of birds of prey would have been impossible. Therefore, funds must be raised to be most valuable to science in the future.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.
Common trap
Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).
Winning move
Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.