Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT21 S4 P3 Q19 Explanation

Abiogenic Theory of Oil

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Since the early 1920s, most petroleum geologists have favored a biogenic theory for the formation of oil. According to this theory, organic matter became buried in sediments, and subsequent over time transformed it into oil.

Since 1979 an opposing abiogenic theory about the origin of oil has been promulgated. According to this theory, what is now oil began as hydrocarbon compounds within the earth’s mantle (the region between the core and the crust) during the formation of the earth. Oil was created when gases rich in methane, crustal plates provided the conduits and fractures necessary for the gases to rise through the crust.

Opponents of the abiogenic theory charge that hydrocarbons could not exist in the mantle, because high temperatures would destroy or break them down. Advocates of the theory, however, point out that other types of carbon exist in the mantle: unoxidized carbon must exist there, because diamonds are formed within the mantle before the higher temperatures, allowing hydrocarbons, like unoxidized carbon, to continue to exist in the mantle.

If the abiogenic theory is correct, vast undiscovered reservoirs of oil and gas—undiscovered because the biogenic model precludes their existence—may in actuality exist. One company owned by the Swedish government has found the abiogenic theory so persuasive that it has started exploratory drilling for gas or oil in a granite formation call that prior to the start of drilling, methane gas had been detected rising through the granite.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

The passage suggests that the opponents of the abiogenic theory mentioned in the third paragraph would most probably agree with which one

Answer choices

  1. Correct77% picked this

    The formation of oil does not involve the condensation of hydrocarbons released from

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap4% picked this

    Large oil reserves are often found in locations that contain small amounts

  3. Trap9% picked this

    The eruptive processes by which diamonds are brought to the earth’s surface are similar to those that aid

  4. Trap5% picked this

    Motions of the crustal plates often create the pressure necessary to transform organic

  5. Trap4% picked this

    The largest known oil reserves may have resulted from organic matter combining with heavier hydrocarbons

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free