Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT2 S1 P4 Q27 Explanation

War Powers Resolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war. Instead, the question of the President’s authority in this matter falls in the hazy area of concurrent power, the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions.

Historically, United States Presidents have not waited for the approval of Congress before involving United States troops in conflicts in which a state of war was not declared. One scholar has identified 199 military engagements that occurred without the consent of Congress, ranging from Jefferson’s conflict with the Barbary pirates to Nixon’s and the President would be applied to the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.

The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed. Most important, the resolution allows Congress to veto the involvement once it begins, decisions to use armed force is in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding

Answer choices

  1. Correct58% picked this

    Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and spirit

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap3% picked this

    Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to the expansion

  3. Trap1% picked this

    Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the

  4. Trap34% picked this

    It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the President’s

  5. Trap4% picked this

    It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in conflicts without a declaration

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free