Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT15 S3 Q22 Explanation

In Sheldon most bicyclists aged 18

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel Flaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In Sheldon most bicyclists aged 18 and over have lights on their bicycles, whereas most bicyclists under the age of 18 do not. It follows that in Sheldon most bicyclists who at least 18 years old.

What this question is testing

Parallel Flaw

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of flawed reasoning most similar to that in

Answer choices

  1. Bad Evidence Match1% picked this

    Most of the people in Sheldon buy gasoline on Mondays only. But almost everyone in Sheldon buys groceries on Tuesdays only. It follows that

    Choice A has a misalignment of quantifiers, moving between most and less than half, which doesn't fit our pattern. The premises here discuss the same group without any opposing groups. The original premises discussed 18 and up vs. under 18.

  2. Bad Evidence Match1% picked this

    The Sheldon Library lent more books during the week after it began lending videos than it had in the entire preceding month. It follows

    Choice B only offers one premise and lacks a necessary comparative structure with opposing group quantifiers that would mirror the flaw.

  3. Correct78% picked this

    Most of the residents of Sheldon who voted in the last election are on the Conservative party’s mailing list, whereas most of Sheldon’s residents

    Why this is right

    Choice C mirrors the original argument with three most claims, comparing those who voted and those who did not, paralleling bikers with and without lights, while assuming the larger percentage means a larger number.

    Skill tested: Parallel Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Bad Evidence Match15% picked this

    In the county where Sheldon is located, every town that has two or more fire trucks has a town pool, whereas most towns that

    Choice D uses 'every' and 'not every,' which doesn't emulate the required 'most' structure from the original argument.

  5. Bad Evidence Match6% picked this

    In Sheldon everyone over the age of 60 who knits also sews, but not everyone over the age of 60 who sews also knits.

    Choice E repeats premises about the same group rather than contrasting groups and doesn't facilitate an overlap similar to the original flawed inference.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free