Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT15 S2 Q24 Explanation

People were asked in a survey

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People were asked in a survey how old they felt. They replied, almost unanimously despite a great diversity of ages, with a number that was 75 percent of their real age. There is, however, a problem in understanding this sort of response. For example, suppose it meant that a 48-year-old man was And surely, that 48-year-old man did not mean to suggest that he felt like a child!

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following techniques of reasoning is employed in

Answer choices

  1. Correct71% picked this

    projecting from responses collected at one time from many individuals of widely different ages to hypothetical earlier responses of a single individual

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap8% picked this

    reinterpreting what certain people actually said in the light of what would, in the circumstances, have been the most reasonable

  3. Trap11% picked this

    qualifying an overly sweeping generalization in light of a single, well

  4. Trap6% picked this

    deriving a contradiction from a pair of statements in order to prove that at least one of

  5. Trap4% picked this

    analyzing an unexpected unanimity among respondents as evidence, not of a great uniformity of opinion among those respondents, but of their

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free