Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT15 S1 P4 Q22 Explanation

Black Economic Progress

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In 1964 the United States federal government began attempts to eliminate racial discrimination in employment and wages: the United States Congress enacted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, prohibiting employers from making employment decisions on the basis of race. In 1965 President Johnson issued Executive Order 11,246, which direct monitoring of minority representation in contractors’ work forces.

Nonetheless, proponents of the “continuous change” hypothesis believe that United States federal law had a marginal impact on the economic progress made by black people in the United States between 1940 and 1975. Instead they emphasize slowly evolving historical forces, such as long-term trends in education that improved segregated schools for black those attending black schools increased relative to the earning potential of those attending white schools.

However, there is no direct evidence linking increased quality of underfunded segregated black schools to these improvements in earning potential. In fact, even the evidence on relative schooling quality is ambiguous. Although in the mid-1940s term length at black schools was approaching that in white schools, the rapid growth in another important all age groups in the United States is more consistent with a decline in employment discrimination.

An additional problem for continuity theorists is how to explain the rapid acceleration of black economic progress in the United States after 1964. Education alone cannot account for the rate of change. Rather, the coincidence of increased United States government antidiscrimination pressure in the mid-1960s with the acceleration in the rate of spite of the vigorous resistance of many Southern leaders, suggests its importance for black economic progress.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

According to the passage, Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act differs from Executive Order 11,246 in

Answer choices

  1. Opposite13% picked this

    monitors employers to ensure minority

    The question stem is about Title VII, but this answer says something that applies to the EO.

  2. Opposite6% picked this

    assesses the workforces of government

    The question stem is about Title VII, but this answer says something that applies to the EO.

  3. Too Strong: eliminates11% picked this

    eliminates discriminatory disparities in

    In context of the first sentence, it sounds like Title VII was part of an attempt to eliminate racial discrimination in wages, but we are only told that Title VII prohibits employment decisions on the basis of race. We don't know whether Title VII directly says anything about wages. We certainly don't hear that it bans discriminatory disparities in wages.

  4. Opposite2% picked this

    focuses on determining minority representation in

    The question stem is about Title VII, but this answer says something that applies to the EO. The EO dealt with government contractors and focused on determining minority representation among contracted employees.

  5. Correct67% picked this

    governs hiring practices in a wider variety

    Why this is right

    Since Title VII is the law of the land, while the EO only regulates the employment practices of government contractors, it's fair to say that Title VII regulates a bigger group of employers.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free