Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT149 S2 P4 Q26 Explanation

Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society. Darwin’s theory of evolution did not directly apply to social ideology, but various intellectuals of a human society need not be competitive, but can emerge through collective action within society.

Gilman identified herself with this latter ideological camp and applied evolutionary theory in the movement for social change. The central thesis of this group of Social Darwinists was that although people, like all life, are the products of natural evolutionary forces, the principles of change that determine the development of organisms have in work that is societally relevant and that makes the best use of that person’s talents.

Gilman was not merely engaged in an intellectual debate. Motivated by her ethical vision and convinced of the plasticity of human nature, Gilman vehemently sought to break the molds into which people, especially women, had been thrust. In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution of a balance that would include what she saw as female qualities of cooperation and nurturance.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The passage can most accurately be described as which one of

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: defending principles2% picked this

    a defense of the principles of social theory that were promulgated by a particular group

    The author is pretty neutral in this passage, so we wouldn't want to call it "a defense of principles". The author never says whether he agrees or disagrees with Gilman, so we can't speculate whether he's writing this passage to defend the principles of Social Darwinism.

  2. Correct42% picked this

    a description of the role played by a particular writer in an intellectual controversy over the consequences

    Why this is right

    The passage focused on the role that Gilman played in advancing the Social Darwinists' views of the consequences (read: logical consequences, implications) of Darwin's theory of natural selection. The weirdest part of this answer is the word "controversy". Can we find something in the passage that sounds like there was an intellectual controversy over what Darwin's theory means? Yes in the very first sentence, which is pretty much our best Main Point sentence: Gilman played an important role in the debate (controversy) over the (scientific) theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society (consequences).

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Focus Too Strong4% picked this

    an explication of the theoretical points of disagreement between two closely related social theories that

    Wrong Focus Too Strong: almost identical goals The main character of this passage is Gilman. This answer doesn't indicate that the passage was primarily about a person. This answer makes it seem like the passage was primarily a compare/contrast between these Social Darwinist theories and those Social Darwinist theories. It's also not supportable that these two schools of thought had "almost identical" goals.

  4. Too Strong: defending / rejecting4% picked this

    a defense of one interpretation of a particular writer’s views, together with a rejection of a competing

    If we understand "a particular writer" to mean Gilman, then we would definitely not be able to say that the author was defending one way to interpret Gilman and rejecting an alternative way of interpreting Gilman. There were not competing interpretations of Gilman. If we understand "a particular writer" to mean Darwin, then we could say that Gilman (and her more activist group of SD's) had one interpretation of Darwin's theories, and the other SD's had a competing interpretation. In that case, this answer is saying that the author defended Gilman's views and rejected the views of the other Social Darwinists (the ones who say it's futile to meddle with the survival of the fittest). Our author doesn't reveal any opinion of or preference for Gilman, and he definitely doesn't say anything to reject the legitimacy of the other group of Social Darwinists. Up through the final sentence, the author is still just presenting Gilman's views at arm's length ... "Future progress, she believed, now required ..."

  5. Out of Scope47% picked this

    an introduction to a general type of scientific theory, clarified by a detailed presentation of one writer’s

    Out of Scope: intro to general type I'm not sure what we could match up with "an introduction to a general type of scientific theory". The first sentence refers to the theories of Charles Darwin, which is not a general type. Also, there's no introduction. The passage is immediately talking about Gilman. We don't spend any time being introduced to Darwin's theories of evolution. The passage actually seems to assume we're already familiar.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free