Reading Comprehension

PT149 · S2 · P4 · Q26 Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society.

Topic

Charlotte Perkins Gilman's views on Social Darwinism and her advocacy for social change, especially regarding women's roles in society.

Framework

Challenge Position + Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Gilman belonged to a school of thought that believed humans, unlike other organisms, could and should consciously direct their own societal evolution, and she advocated for ethical responsibility and active efforts—especially by women—to reshape society beyond traditional, gender-based roles. (The statement that best encapsulates the main point appears at the end of paragraph 2 and beginning of paragraph 3: )

P1: Introduction to Gilman and Social Darwinism Debate

Gilman was a key figure in debates about how Darwin’s theory of evolution should apply to society. She aligned with Social Darwinists who thought social evolution could be shaped by human action, not just competition, and who believed collective human effort could direct societal progress.

P2: Gilman’s Ideology and Ethical Responsibility

Gilman believed evolutionary principles made it possible—and even ethically necessary—for humans to consciously shape social evolution by engaging in meaningful work, focusing on contributions that serve society and make use of individual talents.

P3: Gilman’s Activism and Vision for Women’s Roles

Gilman acted on her beliefs, pushing for women (and others) to break out of restrictive social roles to help reorganize society. She envisioned getting rid of strictly defined, hierarchical gender roles, arguing that past male-driven competitiveness was once useful for society’s growth, but that society’s future needed to emphasize cooperation and nurturance—traits she associated with women.

26.

The passage can most accurately be described as which one of the following?

  1. a defense of the principles

    Out of Scope: defending principles

    The author is pretty neutral in this passage, so we wouldn't want to call it "a defense of principles". The author never says whether he agrees or disagrees with Gilman, so we can't speculate whether he's writing this passage to defend the principles of Social Darwinism.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    a description of the role

    Why this is right

    The passage focused on the role that Gilman played in advancing the Social Darwinists' views of the consequences (read: logical consequences, implications) of Darwin's theory of natural selection. The weirdest part of this answer is the word "controversy". Can we find something in the passage that sounds like there was an intellectual controversy over what Darwin's theory means? Yes in the very first sentence, which is pretty much our best Main Point sentence: Gilman played an important role in the debate (controversy) over the (scientific) theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society (consequences).

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    43% picked this

  3. an explication of the theoretical

    Wrong Focus Too Strong

    Wrong Focus Too Strong: almost identical goals The main character of this passage is Gilman. This answer doesn't indicate that the passage was primarily about a person. This answer makes it seem like the passage was primarily a compare/contrast between these Social Darwinist theories and those Social Darwinist theories. It's also not supportable that these two schools of thought had "almost identical" goals.

    2% picked this

  4. a defense of one interpretation

    Too Strong: defending / rejecting

    If we understand "a particular writer" to mean Gilman, then we would definitely not be able to say that the author was defending one way to interpret Gilman and rejecting an alternative way of interpreting Gilman. There were not competing interpretations of Gilman. If we understand "a particular writer" to mean Darwin, then we could say that Gilman (and her more activist group of SD's) had one interpretation of Darwin's theories, and the other SD's had a competing interpretation. In that case, this answer is saying that the author defended Gilman's views and rejected the views of the other Social Darwinists (the ones who say it's futile to meddle with the survival of the fittest). Our author doesn't reveal any opinion of or preference for Gilman, and he definitely doesn't say anything to reject the legitimacy of the other group of Social Darwinists. Up through the final sentence, the author is still just presenting Gilman's views at arm's length ... "Future progress, she believed, now required ..."

    3% picked this

  5. an introduction to a general

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: intro to general type I'm not sure what we could match up with "an introduction to a general type of scientific theory". The first sentence refers to the theories of Charles Darwin, which is not a general type. Also, there's no introduction. The passage is immediately talking about Gilman. We don't spend any time being introduced to Darwin's theories of evolution. The passage actually seems to assume we're already familiar.

    49% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free