Reading Comprehension

PT149 · S2 · P4 · Q27 Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society.

Topic

Charlotte Perkins Gilman's views on Social Darwinism and her advocacy for social change, especially regarding women's roles in society.

Framework

Challenge Position + Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Gilman belonged to a school of thought that believed humans, unlike other organisms, could and should consciously direct their own societal evolution, and she advocated for ethical responsibility and active efforts—especially by women—to reshape society beyond traditional, gender-based roles. (The statement that best encapsulates the main point appears at the end of paragraph 2 and beginning of paragraph 3: )

P1: Introduction to Gilman and Social Darwinism Debate

Gilman was a key figure in debates about how Darwin’s theory of evolution should apply to society. She aligned with Social Darwinists who thought social evolution could be shaped by human action, not just competition, and who believed collective human effort could direct societal progress.

P2: Gilman’s Ideology and Ethical Responsibility

Gilman believed evolutionary principles made it possible—and even ethically necessary—for humans to consciously shape social evolution by engaging in meaningful work, focusing on contributions that serve society and make use of individual talents.

P3: Gilman’s Activism and Vision for Women’s Roles

Gilman acted on her beliefs, pushing for women (and others) to break out of restrictive social roles to help reorganize society. She envisioned getting rid of strictly defined, hierarchical gender roles, arguing that past male-driven competitiveness was once useful for society’s growth, but that society’s future needed to emphasize cooperation and nurturance—traits she associated with women.

27.

Which one of the following is implied by Gilman's views as described in the passage?

  1. Correct

    Some social conditions on which

    Why this is right

    "Some" is lovably weak. We only need one example to support this. Do we have an example of a social condition that was necessary at a certain time in human history for social evolution but was / is detrimental to social evolution at some other time? Yes, in the 2nd to last sentence, it says that Gilman believed that "at one time, such arrangements were necessary" and the following sentence says "future progress (social evolution) now required something different". What was this social condition that was at one time needed and now different from what future progress requires? It was gender-specific work roles and hierarchical relationships.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    59% picked this

  2. The types of changes that

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: can't be except through Out of Scope: genuine evolution The passage never gets into supposed social evolution vs. genuine social evolution, and it never declares such a rigid rule as "only coordinated efforts directed at consciously formulated goal" can move us forward.

    11% picked this

  3. Gender-based hierarchical relationships, which predated,

    Too Strong: especially difficult

    This answer creates a new relationship out of two things that are just listed as "A and B": gender specific work roles and hierarchical relationships are two things she wants to abandon. If we were told "a central goal she envisioned was the abandonment of A and B", we can't derive from that the idea that "B predated A and led to the development of A". We would need to be able point to a line that justifies saying that getting rid of hierarchies would be especially difficult.

    4% picked this

  4. While Social Darwinist theories are

    Contradicted

    We are told towards the end of the 2nd paragraph that, "This, for Gilman, was not simply descriptive but was also ethical."

    5% picked this

  5. Continuation of the process of

    Wrong Time Sequence

    This feels somewhat derivable from the conditional logic of the last sentence: Future progress ? Restoration that would incl. cooperate / nurture If we were to symbolize this answer as conditional logic, it would look essentially the same. But the conditional verb being used does change the meaning. Gilman, in saying that future progress requires restoring the balance, is saying "you won't have progress until you restore the balance". First, you restore the balance, then maybe you can have future progress. But this answer choice is saying, "first you have future progress, and then that leads to restoration of the balance".

    21% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free