Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT149 S2 P4 Q27 Explanation

Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society. Darwin’s theory of evolution did not directly apply to social ideology, but various intellectuals of a human society need not be competitive, but can emerge through collective action within society.

Gilman identified herself with this latter ideological camp and applied evolutionary theory in the movement for social change. The central thesis of this group of Social Darwinists was that although people, like all life, are the products of natural evolutionary forces, the principles of change that determine the development of organisms have in work that is societally relevant and that makes the best use of that person’s talents.

Gilman was not merely engaged in an intellectual debate. Motivated by her ethical vision and convinced of the plasticity of human nature, Gilman vehemently sought to break the molds into which people, especially women, had been thrust. In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution of a balance that would include what she saw as female qualities of cooperation and nurturance.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

Which one of the following is implied by Gilman’s views as described

Answer choices

  1. Correct55% picked this

    Some social conditions on which social evolution depends at certain times in human history are detrimental to further social evolution

    Why this is right

    "Some" is lovably weak. We only need one example to support this. Do we have an example of a social condition that was necessary at a certain time in human history for social evolution but was / is detrimental to social evolution at some other time? Yes, in the 2nd to last sentence, it says that Gilman believed that "at one time, such arrangements were necessary" and the following sentence says "future progress (social evolution) now required something different". What was this social condition that was at one time needed and now different from what future progress requires? It was gender-specific work roles and hierarchical relationships.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong12% picked this

    The types of changes that constitute genuine social evolution can no longer be brought about except through coordinated efforts

    Too Strong: can't be except through Out of Scope: genuine evolution The passage never gets into supposed social evolution vs. genuine social evolution, and it never declares such a rigid rule as "only coordinated efforts directed at consciously formulated goal" can move us forward.

  3. Too Strong: especially difficult5% picked this

    Gender-based hierarchical relationships, which predated, and led to the development of, gender-specific work roles, will probably be

    This answer creates a new relationship out of two things that are just listed as "A and B": gender specific work roles and hierarchical relationships are two things she wants to abandon. If we were told "a central goal she envisioned was the abandonment of A and B", we can't derive from that the idea that "B predated A and led to the development of A". We would need to be able point to a line that justifies saying that getting rid of hierarchies would be especially difficult.

  4. Contradicted7% picked this

    While Social Darwinist theories are essentially descriptive and thus do not have ethical implications, they can be useful

    We are told towards the end of the 2nd paragraph that, "This, for Gilman, was not simply descriptive but was also ethical."

  5. Wrong Time Sequence20% picked this

    Continuation of the process of social evolution will lead inevitably to the inclusion of more cooperation and

    This feels somewhat derivable from the conditional logic of the last sentence: Future progress ? Restoration that would incl. cooperate / nurture If we were to symbolize this answer as conditional logic, it would look essentially the same. But the conditional verb being used does change the meaning. Gilman, in saying that future progress requires restoring the balance, is saying "you won't have progress until you restore the balance". First, you restore the balance, then maybe you can have future progress. But this answer choice is saying, "first you have future progress, and then that leads to restoration of the balance".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free