Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT149 S2 P4 Q25 Explanation

Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society. Darwin’s theory of evolution did not directly apply to social ideology, but various intellectuals of a human society need not be competitive, but can emerge through collective action within society.

Gilman identified herself with this latter ideological camp and applied evolutionary theory in the movement for social change. The central thesis of this group of Social Darwinists was that although people, like all life, are the products of natural evolutionary forces, the principles of change that determine the development of organisms have in work that is societally relevant and that makes the best use of that person’s talents.

Gilman was not merely engaged in an intellectual debate. Motivated by her ethical vision and convinced of the plasticity of human nature, Gilman vehemently sought to break the molds into which people, especially women, had been thrust. In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution of a balance that would include what she saw as female qualities of cooperation and nurturance.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

The passage gives evidence that Gilman valued which one of the following as an instrument of social progress

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope18% picked this

    Industrialization is never mentioned in the passage. The idea of factories and assembly lines being an instrument of social progress also doesn't sound like anything we heard about Gilman.

  2. Correct54% picked this

    fiction

    Why this is right

    We probably wouldn't fall in love with this on a first pass, but it's ultimately the most supportable answer. In the last paragraph, it says: In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution by collectively working toward a reorganization of society. If she was urging women to reorganize society in order to further social evolution within her fiction, then must consider her fiction a potential instrument of social progress.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope2% picked this

    international

    International travel (or travel of any kind) is never mentioned in the passage. There was nothing in the passage that sounded like, "We can make progress if we all just see the world!"

  4. Out of Scope1% picked this

    religious

    Religion is never mentioned in the passage. We never heard anything like, "By being trained to be more religious, we can advance social progress".

  5. Out of Scope25% picked this

    combative personality

    Out of Scope: combative personality Word Salad / Opposite (if anything) The passage never discusses combative personalities. That means "argumentative / prone to disagreeing with people". It talks about assertiveness, which is not inherently combative. It also talks about combat, but that's the noun. The idea of warfare. That is not what a combative personality trait means. That's literal combat. Moreover, these male traits being discussed are things that were necessary "at one time", in the past, in order for complex society to develop. Ancient Greece and Rome and Egypt are all complex societies (if not many before that), so those male traits achieved their work as an instrument of social progress when humans developed complex societies. The question stem is asking "in Gilman's time, what does she value as an instrument of social progress?", and she identifies these male traits as things that WERE useful in our evolutionary history but values turning the page into a more feminine direction.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free