Reading Comprehension

PT149 · S2 · P4 · Q25 Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society.

Topic

Charlotte Perkins Gilman's views on Social Darwinism and her advocacy for social change, especially regarding women's roles in society.

Framework

Challenge Position + Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Gilman belonged to a school of thought that believed humans, unlike other organisms, could and should consciously direct their own societal evolution, and she advocated for ethical responsibility and active efforts—especially by women—to reshape society beyond traditional, gender-based roles. (The statement that best encapsulates the main point appears at the end of paragraph 2 and beginning of paragraph 3: )

P1: Introduction to Gilman and Social Darwinism Debate

Gilman was a key figure in debates about how Darwin’s theory of evolution should apply to society. She aligned with Social Darwinists who thought social evolution could be shaped by human action, not just competition, and who believed collective human effort could direct societal progress.

P2: Gilman’s Ideology and Ethical Responsibility

Gilman believed evolutionary principles made it possible—and even ethically necessary—for humans to consciously shape social evolution by engaging in meaningful work, focusing on contributions that serve society and make use of individual talents.

P3: Gilman’s Activism and Vision for Women’s Roles

Gilman acted on her beliefs, pushing for women (and others) to break out of restrictive social roles to help reorganize society. She envisioned getting rid of strictly defined, hierarchical gender roles, arguing that past male-driven competitiveness was once useful for society’s growth, but that society’s future needed to emphasize cooperation and nurturance—traits she associated with women.

25.

The passage gives evidence that Gilman valued which one of the following as an instrument of social progress in her time?

  1. industrialization

    Out of Scope

    Industrialization is never mentioned in the passage. The idea of factories and assembly lines being an instrument of social progress also doesn't sound like anything we heard about Gilman.

    18% picked this

  2. Correct

    fiction writing

    Why this is right

    We probably wouldn't fall in love with this on a first pass, but it's ultimately the most supportable answer. In the last paragraph, it says: In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution by collectively working toward a reorganization of society. If she was urging women to reorganize society in order to further social evolution within her fiction, then must consider her fiction a potential instrument of social progress.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    55% picked this

  3. international travel

    Out of Scope

    International travel (or travel of any kind) is never mentioned in the passage. There was nothing in the passage that sounded like, "We can make progress if we all just see the world!"

    1% picked this

  4. religious training

    Out of Scope

    Religion is never mentioned in the passage. We never heard anything like, "By being trained to be more religious, we can advance social progress".

    1% picked this

  5. combative personality traits

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: combative personality Word Salad / Opposite (if anything) The passage never discusses combative personalities. That means "argumentative / prone to disagreeing with people". It talks about assertiveness, which is not inherently combative. It also talks about combat, but that's the noun. The idea of warfare. That is not what a combative personality trait means. That's literal combat. Moreover, these male traits being discussed are things that were necessary "at one time", in the past, in order for complex society to develop. Ancient Greece and Rome and Egypt are all complex societies (if not many before that), so those male traits achieved their work as an instrument of social progress when humans developed complex societies. The question stem is asking "in Gilman's time, what does she value as an instrument of social progress?", and she identifies these male traits as things that WERE useful in our evolutionary history but values turning the page into a more feminine direction.

    25% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free