Logical Reasoning

PT147 · S4 · Q11 Linguist: Three of the four subfamilies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Linguist: Three of the four subfamilies of the so-called "Austronesian" languages are found only among indigenous peoples in Taiwan, whereas the fourth is found on islands over a huge area stretching from Madagascar to the eastern Pacific Ocean.

Conclusion (hence)

Austronesia-speaking people originated in Taiwan and later migrated to other islands.

Intermediate Conclusion (these facts suggest)

Taiwan in the homeland where Austronesian languages have been spoken longest.

Evidence

All subfamilies of Austronesian originated in the same language, which would have been in a single geographic location.

3 of the 4 subfamilies are found only in Taiwan, whereas the fourth is found on islands stretching from Madagascar to the eastern Pacific.

Evaluate

On Main Conclusion questions, the conclusion is almost always earlier than the evidence, but not this time.

The last sentence offers four consecutive claims, and the keywords go like this ...

Since claim 1, which means claim 2, these facts suggest that claim 3 and hence, that claim 4.

So we can see that 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4.

The first sentence is a fact, not an opinion, so it couldn't be the Main Conclusion.

Goal

Let's look for a rephrasing of the final claim, .

11.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the linguist's argument?

  1. The Austronesian family of languages

    Background Fact

    This is the first claim, which is factual and not supported. Conclusions are supported opinions.

    0% picked this

  2. Wherever most subfamilies of the

    Assumption

    This claim was never stated, so it can't be the Conclusion. It's just designed to "feel like the Author" because it's expressing one of her assumptions.

    3% picked this

  3. Taiwan is probably the homeland

    Intermediate Conclusion

    This is a supported opinion from the author, so it is a conclusion. But since the following claim (the final claim of the paragraph) begins "and hence", we know that the last claim is a bigger conclusion.

    8% picked this

  4. Austronesian-speaking peoples originated in the

    Assumption

    This claim was never stated, so it can't be the Conclusion. It's just designed to "feel like the Author" because it's expressing one of her assumptions.

    5% picked this

  5. Correct

    Austronesian-speaking peoples probably originated in

    Why this is right

    This rephrases the last claim of the paragraph, which was the main conclusion (prefaced by the conclusion indicator Hence and supported by all the other claims in the paragraph).

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    84% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free