Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT144 S2 Q17 Explanation

City leader: If our city adopts the new

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

City leader: If our city adopts the new tourism plan, the amount of money that tourists spend here annually will increase by at least $2 billion, creating as many jobs as a new automobile manufacturing plant would. It would be reasonable for the city to spend the amount of money plant here, but adopting the tourism plan would cost less.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The city leader's statements, if true, provide the most support for which one

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: least expensive15% picked this

    The city should implement the least expensive job creation

    We only know about two job creation measures, and we know that the tourism plan is the less expensive of the two. We don't know anything about the least expensive measure available, so we have no support for saying the city should implement that one.

  2. Too Strong7% picked this

    In general, it is reasonable for the city to spend money to try to convince manufacturing companies to

    Too Strong: manufacturing in general One-Claim Support We were told it would be reasonable to spend money to try to convince an auto manufacturer to build a plant in the city. But we don't know if it's reasonable to convince most manufacturing plants to build in the city. Maybe auto plants are more appealing because they create more jobs than other manufacturing plants would. Maybe other manufacturing plants have a lot more pollution. Since we're only told about auto manufacturing, we can't speculate about what would be true for manufacturing, in general. We should be nervous picking this answer since it would only involve one-claim as support. The correct answer to an inference question will almost always involve combining 2 or more claims.

  3. Out of Scope: can't afford both12% picked this

    The city cannot afford both to spend money to convince an automobile manufacturer to build a plant in the city and to

    We don't have any grounds for saying that the city doesn't have enough money to do both things: the new tourism plan and trying to convince a car manufacturer to locate here. The fact that we're discussing both options doesn't imply that we will be choosing exactly one of them (we might choose neither, we might choose both).

  4. Correct66% picked this

    It would be reasonable for the city to adopt the new

    Why this is right

    We can support this. It's not definitely true, but it's supportable. We were told that it would be reasonable for the city to spend money to convince the auto manufacturer to build a plant here. And we're told that the tourism plan costs less but would create as many jobs. If it's reasonable to spend X dollars to create Y jobs, then wouldn't it be reasonable to spend less-than-X dollars to create Y jobs?

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Contradicted0% picked this

    The only way the city can create jobs is by

    We could either say this is too strong because we were never told that the new tourism plan is the only way to create jobs. Or we could say this is contradicted by the fact that we could potentially create jobs by convincing an automobile manufacturer to build a plant here.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free