Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT144 S1 P3 Q19 Explanation

Wampum

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Before contact with Europeans, the Haudenosaune, a group of nations in northeastern North America also known as the Iroquois, had been developing a form of communication, primarily for political purposes, that used wampum, a bead carved from seashell. Most historians have insisted that wampum was primarily a form of money. While wampum distinct nations. Over time wampum came to be used to record and convey key sociopolitical messages.

Wampum came in two colors, white and deep purple. Loose beads constituted the simplest and oldest form of wampum. Even in the form of loose beads, wampum could represent certain basic ideas. For example, white was associated with the sky-yearning spirit, Sapling, whose terrestrial creations, such as trees, were often beneficial to is thought that string wampum was used to send simple political messages such as truce requests.

It was, however, the formation of the Haudenosaune Confederacy from a group of warring tribes, believed by some to have occurred around 1451, that supplied the major impetus for making wampum a deliberate system of both arbitrary and pictorially derived symbols designed primarily for political purposes. This is evident in the invention it served to effectively frame and enforce the law of the confederacy for hundreds of years.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: other peoples3% picked this

    There is evidence that objects similar to wampum were used for symbolic representation by other peoples in

    We never talk about any other peoples using stuff similar to wampum, just the Haudensaune and the actual wampum.

  2. Too Strong: insisted in spite4% picked this

    The Europeans who first came in contact with the Haudenosaune insisted on using wampum as a form of currency in spite of

    We only know that the Europeans misinterpreted the true significance. We don't know that they were ever aware of the true significance, and you would have to be aware of it in order to deliberately insist on using it the wrong way. It's possible that the Haudensaune were politely humoring the Europeans and "playing along" like wampum was just money to them.

  3. Opposite Causal Relationship6% picked this

    There is evidence that Europeans who came in contact with the Haudenosaune adopted some long-standing

    The first few sentences indicate that wampum came to be a medium of exchange among the Haudenosaune, but due to the Europeans. The Haudenosaune adopted a European use of wampum, but we have no evidence that Europeans ever used wampum to communicate with spirit gods, send political messages, or encode a Constitution (long-standing Haudenosaune uses).

  4. Opposite38% picked this

    A long-term peaceful association among the groups that formed the Haudenosaune Confederacy was an important precondition for the use of wampum

    Opposite: peaceful System vs. Means of Communication The first sentence of the last paragraph says that an important precondition for the use of wampum as a "deliberate system of symbols" was a non-peaceful association among a group of "warring tribes". Even if this answer had removed the "peaceful" part, using wampum to encode the Confederacy's constitution wasn't the first time that wampum was used as a "means of communication". Tossing beads in the water was a means of communicating with the Sapling and Flint, and string wampum was a means of communicating truce requests. Both of those predated the Confederacy formation.

  5. Correct50% picked this

    Present day interpretations of the significance of some of the symbols used in wampum belts

    Why this is right

    This claim is lovably weak. Can you imagine how bold the author would be do disagree with this? She'd be saying that "Present day interpretations of 100% of the symbols used in wampum are 100% definitively accurate." All she needs to believe in order to agree to this idea is that there is at least one symbol used in wampum that we're totally sure about. We get support for this idea in the middle of the 3rd paragraph: Council fires, possibly indicating talks in progress, were diamond outlines ... Yup, it's that obnoxious. If it possibly indicates "talks in progress", then apparently we're not totally sure what it indicates. Thus, not all present day interpretations are conclusive.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free