Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT143 S4 Q5 Explanation

Most scholars are puzzled

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Many scholars are puzzled about who created the seventeenth-century abridgment of Shakespeare’s Hamlet contained in the First Quarto. Two facts about the work shed light on this question. First, the person who undertook the abridgment clearly did not possess a copy of Hamlet. Second, the abridgment contains a very characters, but a slipshod handling of all the other parts.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following statements is most supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Support Against1% picked this

    The abridgment was prepared by

    In all likelihood, Shakespeare would have had a copy of Hamlet and would have done an equally good job of rendering the speeches of all of the parts.

  2. Out of Scope - Purpose1% picked this

    The abridgment was created to make Hamlet easier to produce

    This purpose has no support since nothing in the two facts suggests that the abridgment made Hamlet easier to produce on stage.

  3. Correct80% picked this

    The abridgment was produced by an actor who had played a

    Why this is right

    This could explain why the rendering of the speeches of one of the characters was so accurate while so poor for all of the other parts.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Support Against14% picked this

    The abridgment was prepared by a spectator of a performance

    There’s no reason to suspect that a spectator would have been able to render the speeches of one of the characters so accurately.

  5. Out of Scope - Purpose4% picked this

    The abridgment was produced by an actor who was trying to

    The intent implied in this answer has no support in the statements.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free