Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT142 S4 Q2 Explanation

Historian: During the Industrial Revolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Historian: During the Industrial Revolution, for the first time in history, the productivity of the economy grew at a faster rate than the population and thus dramatically improved living standards. An economist theorizes that this growth was made possible by the spread of values such as hard work and thrift. But successful demonstrates that a change in values occurred prior to the Industrial Revolution.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

The overall conclusion of the historian’s argument

Answer choices

  1. Premise1% picked this

    during the Industrial Revolution the productivity of the economy grew at a faster rate

    This answer repeats a premise about economic growth during the Industrial Revolution.

  2. Premise2% picked this

    the fact that the productivity of the economy grew at a faster rate than the population during the Industrial Revolution led to

    This answer is another premise discussing economic growth's effect on living standards, not the author's main conclusion.

  3. Correct96% picked this

    no one should accept the economist’s explanation until historical evidence demonstrates that a change in values occurred prior

    Why this is right

    This matches the meaning of the historian's overall conclusion, which is about not accepting the economist's explanation without historical evidence of a change in values.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Opposing Idea2% picked this

    the improvement in living standards that occurred during the Industrial Revolution was not due to the spread of

    This answer implies a specific claim about what did not cause the improvement, which is part of the economist’s theory being disputed, not the main point of the historian.

  5. Opposing Idea0% picked this

    values such as hard work and thrift did not become widespread prior to

    This answer touches on the economist's theory regarding values and is used as part of the premise, not the historian's conclusion.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free