Reading Comprehension

PT14 · S3 · P2 · Q13 Deconstruction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Innovations in language are never completely new.

Topic

The evolution and implications of specialized language in poststructuralist literary criticism, especially terms like "signifier," "signified," and "deconstruction."

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Many of the key terms used by contemporary literary critics—especially “deconstruction”—are borrowed or adapted from existing language and carry unintended connotations that shape how people perceive literary theory, sometimes in ways that undermine the seriousness or skill of the work. ( - opening sentence)

P1: Language Innovation in Literary Theory

Words in all fields, including literary criticism, evolve by borrowing from existing language. Even “new” language in literary theory (like poststructuralism or deconstruction) drags old meanings along with it, affecting how we understand it.

P2: "Signifier" and "Signified" as Borrowed Terms

The movement’s first big terms, “signifier” and “signified,” are borrowed to emphasize both the arbitrariness and significance of naming things. The choice of these words, over simpler ones like “word” and “thing,” highlights the seriousness given to language, and in English these words also hint that language shapes the future.

P3: The Term "Deconstruction" and Its Consequences

“Deconstruction” comes from the building trades and introduces a mechanical, rather than organic, view of literature—suggesting that writers are less artists and more like laborers assembling pre-existing materials. The act of deconstructing a text implies repeated, almost destructive analysis that exposes flaws, rather than appreciation.

13.

The passage suggests that which one of the following most accurately describes the author’s view of deconstructionist thought?

  1. The author is guardedly optimistic

    Opposite: optimistic

    Opposite: optimistic

    11% picked this

  2. The author endorses the utility

    Opposite: endorses

    Opposite: endorses

    9% picked this

  3. The author is enthusiastic about

    Opposite: enthusiastic

    Opposite: enthusiastic

    6% picked this

  4. Correct

    The author regards deconstruction’s tendency

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    70% picked this

  5. The author condemns deconstruction’s attempts

    Bad Objection

    The deconstructionists were never attempting to define literary criticism as a creative act, and even if they were the author would probably endorse that idea.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free