Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT139 S3 P2 Q9 Explanation

A Return to Tintypes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

When Jayne Hinds Bidaut saw her first tintype, she was so struck by its rich creamy tones that she could hardly believe this photographic process had been abandoned. She set out to revive it. Bidaut had been searching for a way to photograph insects from her entomological collection, but paper prints simply dimensionality she wanted. The image-containing emulsion can often create a raised surface on the plate.

For the photographer Dan Estabrook, old albumen prints and tintypes inspired a fantasy. He imagines planting the ones he makes in flea markets and antique shops, to be bygone time that never existed.

On the verge of a filmless, digital revolution, photography is moving forward into its past. In addition to reviving the tintype process, photographers are polishing daguerreotype plates, coating paper with egg whites, making pinhole cameras, and mixing emulsions from nineteenth-century recipes in order to coax new expressive effects from old photography’s roots that the movement is more like a groundswell.

The old techniques are heavily hands-on and idiosyncratic. That is the source of their appeal. It is also the prime reason for their eclipse. Most became obsolete in a few decades, replaced by others that were simpler, cheaper, faster, and more consistent in their results. Only the tintype lasted as a curiosity cropped out by a nineteenth- century photographer, Estabrook retains them to heighten the sense of nostalgia.

This preoccupation with contingency offers a clue to the deeper motivations of many of the antiquarian avant-gardists. The widely variable outcome of old techniques virtually guarantees that each production is one of a kind and bears, on some level, the indelible mark of the artist’s encounter with a particular set of circumstances. an intimacy with photographic communication that mass media have all but overwhelmed.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Based on the passage, which one of the following most accurately describes an attitude displayed by the author toward artists’ uses

Answer choices

  1. Too Negative1% picked this

    doubtful hesitation about the artistic value of using

    It seems like the author clearly recognizes the perceived artistic value that the photographers are getting by using these techniques. The author has never tipped her hand that she likes this whole "fake nostalgia" bit. But she clearly understands the aesthetic motivations of the people using these techniques, and she never calls into question their artistic value.

  2. Correct78% picked this

    appreciative understanding of the artists' aesthetic

    Why this is right

    Since we thought our Support Window (where the author shows attitude about this group of artists) was the 5th paragraph, it's a lovable sign that the framing idea of the 5th paragraph is saying ... this preoccupation with X offers a clue to the deeper motivations of the artists In other words, "Check it out --- I'm going to tell you what the artists are going for, here. This is the effect / the experience that they're trying to achieve. Their aesthetic goals are to embrace uncertainty, chance imperfections, and unique blemishes, as well as to leave an indelible mark of uniqueness and intimacy on each product." The word "appreciative" might seem overly positive, since she never explicitly seems to be like, "I'm a fan of these new photographs". But this is meant more like when someone says, "Okay, Todd, that's enough. We appreciate your concern that the hot dogs will get cold, but we need to move on with the meeting." It's not appreciate like, "I'm so grateful you did that". It's appreciate like, "I understand where you're coming from". When we say, "I can appreciate what the artist was going for here, even if they didn't fully pull it off", we're saying, "I understand the artist's intent / ambitions".

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Negative13% picked this

    ironic amusement at the continued use of techniques that

    The attitude described here is like "a condescending look into the world of these losers that are futzing around with dumb old stuff". That's ^ overly harsh, but this answer is taking us in that direction. We the reader might be like, "You guys are some straight up photography nerds, painting egg emulsions on your weird-ass steampunk camera equipment", but the author very respectfully lays out the artistic impetus for the trend. There really isn't any snark or mockery we can find that would support "ironic".

  4. Too Positive5% picked this

    enthusiastic endorsement of their implicit critique of modem

    The passage never explicitly discusses any "critique" of modern photographic technology. These artists are clearly wanting something that isn't the modern experience, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they're critiquing modern technology. Given how invisible the critique is, it would be hard us to find the author explicitly providing moments of enthusiastic support. Our author seems pleasantly interested in this undertaking, but we don't get any evidence that she's like, "Wow, count me in!"

  5. Wrong Emphasis3% picked this

    whimsical curiosity about the ways in which the

    It's probably fair to say that our author has some whimsical interest in how these processes work. But we can't say that's the best available answer describing our author's attitude toward these artists. First of all, how the old processes work isn't really even about the artists. They're not reinventing the processes. They're just replicating the old techniques, as far as we know. Secondly, if the author were this curious about how the processes work, then we'd probably get more than just 1 sentence in the 3rd paragraph that lists 5 of them. The author spends two bulky paragraphs (the 4th and 5th), discussing the artistic appeal of these techniques to the practitioners, and spends only one measly sentence mentioning 5 processes.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free