Logical Reasoning

PT137 · S4 · Q19 If the jury did not return

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

If the jury did not return a verdict, there would still be media trucks outside the courthouse.

Evidence

If the jury did not ~RV → MT return a verdict, there would still be media trucks outside the courthouse.

There are no media ~MT trucks outside the courthouse.

Conclusion

The jury must have RV returned a verdict.

Evaluate

This argument reasons by way of contrapositive and is a valid argument.

19.

The pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following arguments?

  1. If a hurricane arises off

    Wrong Reasoning / Wrong Validity

    If a hurricane arises off H ? ?T the coast this summer, our town will see less tourism than usual. There will be no ~H hurricane this summer. There will be no less ~?T tourism than usual.

    3% picked this

  2. Correct

    If Peter did not buy

    Why this is right

    If Peter did not buy a ~BH ? RA house, he would have rented an apartment. Peter did not rent an ~RA apartment. He must have bought BH a house.

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    90% picked this

  3. Renate promised Linus that if

    Wrong Reasoning

    Renate promised Linus ~CW ? DW that if his car was not working, she would drive him to work. Linus’s car is not ~CW working. Renate must have DW driven him to work.

    5% picked this

  4. If Kay's television was not

    Wrong Reasoning

    If Kay’s television was ~TW ? GM not working last night, she would have gone to a movie. Her television has not ~TW been working for the past week. She must have gone GM to a movie last night.

    2% picked this

  5. If Ralph had told Manuela

    Wrong Reasoning / Wrong Validity

    If Ralph had told TM ? MS Manuela about the problem, Manuela would have solved it. Ralph did not tell ~TM Manuela about the problem. Someone else must ~MS have solved it.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free