Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT137 S4 Q17 Explanation

In order to save money

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In order to save money, many consumers redeem coupons that are distributed by retail stores. However, in general, retail stores that distribute and accept store coupons as a way of discounting the prices on certain products charge more for their products, on average, than other retail stores charge for the same products­ for this expense without reducing profits, retail stores must pass it on to consumers.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Relationship17% picked this

    Many consumers who redeem coupons save little if any money, overall,

    The number of consumers who do not save much money by redeeming coupons is not discussed in the information.

  2. Correct65% picked this

    Retail stores that distribute coupons generally compensate for the expense of producing and distributing coupons by charging higher

    Why this is right

    This follows from the second statement [retail stores charge higher prices], third statement [producing and distributing coupons is expensive], and fourth statement [retail stores compensate for the expense].

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Contradiction5% picked this

    The profits of retail stores that use coupons are not significantly lower, on average, than the profits of similar stores

    The statements suggest that retails stores that use coupons pass the expense of doing so on to the customer with higher overall prices.

  4. Unsupported Relationship3% picked this

    At least some retail stores that do not use coupons do not have expenses that they

    Retail stores that do not use coupons are not discussed in the information.

  5. Too Strong11% picked this

    The undiscounted price charged for a good for which a retail store offers a coupon will be higher than the price charged for that

    The statements provide that overall the prices at stores that distribute and accept coupons are higher than at stores that do not offer coupons, but to say that the relationship holds for any item carried by both types of stores goes too far.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free