A species in which mutations frequently occur will develop new evolutionary adaptations in each generation.
Conclusion
A species in which mutations frequently occur will survive dramatic environmental changes.
Evidence
A species in which mutations frequently occur will develop new adaptions every generation. + Only species that develop new adaptions every generation can survive dramatic environmental changes
Evaluation
Because we see conditional logic triggers (will, only if, will) and repeating ideas ("survive dramatic" / "frequent mutations" / "adaptations each generation" are all mentioned twice), we should try to diagram this.
Frequent Mutations → New A's each gen A → B Survive Dramatic → New A's each gen C → B ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Freq Mutations → Survive Dramatic A → C
Goal
This is making a Necessary vs. Sufficient error with the second premise, thinking that it goes B → C.
How can we make some quick eliminations? We can look for 2 conditional premises and 1 conditional conclusion. We can verify that both conditional premises have the same outcome (right side).