Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT137 S1 P3 Q18 Explanation

Non-Indigenous Species

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Until recently, conservationists were often complacent about the effect of nonindigenous plant and animal species on the ecosystems they invade. Many shared Charles Elton’s view, introduced in his 1958 book on invasive species, that disturbed habitats are most vulnerable to new arrivals because they contain fewer or less vigorous native problems and high damage and control costs generated by these invasions merit serious concern.

Invasive plants profoundly affect ecosystems and threaten biodiversity throughout the world. For example, to the untrained eye, the Everglades National Park in Florida appears wild and natural. Yet this and other unique ecosystems are being degraded as surely as if by chemical pollution. In Florida, forests are growing where none existed before. introduction of Scotch broom plants led to the disappearance of a diverse set of native reptiles.

Passage B The real threat posed by so-called invasive species isn’t against nature but against humans’ ideas of what nature is supposed to be. Species invasion is not a zero-sum game, with new species replacing old ones at a one-to-one ratio. Rather, and with critical exceptions, it is a positive-sum game, in new species and lose few or no native species, the overall species count goes up.

Invasions don’t cause ecosystems to collapse. Invasions may radically alter the components of an ecosystem, perhaps to a point at which the ecosystem becomes less valuable or engaging to humans. But 50 years of study has failed to identify a clear ecological difference between an ecosystem rich in native species and one make ecosystems shrink or disappear. They simply transform them into different ecosystems.

When the issue is phrased as one of ecosystem destruction, the stakes are stark: we choose between nature’s life and nature’s death. In actuality, introduced species present a continuum. A few species do cause costly damage and tragic extinctions. But most plant and animal species simply blend in harmlessly. The issue they nature but rather what kind of nature we will have around us.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following is most analogous to the main point

Answer choices

  1. Weak Match4% picked this

    The loss of a favorite piece of clothing when it starts to fray after many years is not

    This isn't terrible, but it's emphasis seems off. We could try to massage this into working if we thought of Passage B's main point as, "Don't be sad about the native plants that this invasive species displaced out of this ecosystem ... that loss is not necessarily a meaningful loss". But this loss of a favorite piece of clothing isn't because it's being replaced by something new; it's just from the deterioration brought about by time.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    The alteration of a culture's folk music by the influence of music from other cultures

    Why this is right

    This is our best option. It's addressing an audience who is worried that the influence of new stuff (music) from another culture could ruin their local stuff (their folk music). This answer is saying, "Don't lament the influence of outside music on your precious folk music. Maybe it just changes it in a way you don't have to lament as being worse." Music from other cultures = invasive species Folk music = native species

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong7% picked this

    The expansion of urban development into previously rural areas is a necessary

    Too Strong: necessary Weak Match: expansion of urban The author of passage B wasn't saying that an influx of invasive/introduced species was a necessary consequence of progress. He was just saying, "It's not the end of the world if an invasive species gets introduced." And it's weird to match up the idea of "urban areas expanding into rural areas" with the idea of "a plant from a completely different area being placed into a native ecosystem". The former is about two adjacent things exchanging market share. The latter is like a student being transferred from one school to a school in a whole other state.

  4. Too Strong: only7% picked this

    Cultures can only benefit when they absorb and adapt ideas that originated

    The author of B was saying, "an outside species being introduced into a native ecosystem isn't necessarily a bad thing. It just changes it. It's not a disaster." This answer portrays B's main point as, "the only way a native ecosystem can ever get better is when it absorbs an outside species that's introduced to it".

  5. Topic Trap Bad Match2% picked this

    While horticulturalists can create new plant species through hybridization, hybridization also occurs

    The fact that this is also about plants makes it an instant red flag, because trap answers on Analogy / Parallel tend to just try to bait us with a similar topic. This answer is stressing how something can happen through human intervention or in the wild. Was the main point of B that "invasive species can happen through human intervention or in the wild"? No, it was more about countering the hysteria of people who were freaked out by invasive species. This answer sounds too neutral and informational to match that.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free