Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT137 S1 P3 Q19 Explanation

Non-Indigenous Species

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMethodScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Until recently, conservationists were often complacent about the effect of nonindigenous plant and animal species on the ecosystems they invade. Many shared Charles Elton’s view, introduced in his 1958 book on invasive species, that disturbed habitats are most vulnerable to new arrivals because they contain fewer or less vigorous native problems and high damage and control costs generated by these invasions merit serious concern.

Invasive plants profoundly affect ecosystems and threaten biodiversity throughout the world. For example, to the untrained eye, the Everglades National Park in Florida appears wild and natural. Yet this and other unique ecosystems are being degraded as surely as if by chemical pollution. In Florida, forests are growing where none existed before. introduction of Scotch broom plants led to the disappearance of a diverse set of native reptiles.

Passage B The real threat posed by so-called invasive species isn’t against nature but against humans’ ideas of what nature is supposed to be. Species invasion is not a zero-sum game, with new species replacing old ones at a one-to-one ratio. Rather, and with critical exceptions, it is a positive-sum game, in new species and lose few or no native species, the overall species count goes up.

Invasions don’t cause ecosystems to collapse. Invasions may radically alter the components of an ecosystem, perhaps to a point at which the ecosystem becomes less valuable or engaging to humans. But 50 years of study has failed to identify a clear ecological difference between an ecosystem rich in native species and one make ecosystems shrink or disappear. They simply transform them into different ecosystems.

When the issue is phrased as one of ecosystem destruction, the stakes are stark: we choose between nature’s life and nature’s death. In actuality, introduced species present a continuum. A few species do cause costly damage and tragic extinctions. But most plant and animal species simply blend in harmlessly. The issue they nature but rather what kind of nature we will have around us.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following most accurately characterizes the relationship between the

Answer choices

  1. Not Causal2% picked this

    Passage A presents a hypothesis about the causes of a particular phenomenon, while passage B presents an alternative hypothesis about

    The two passages are not trying to solve any causal mystery. Neither passage is offering a hypothesis (a causal explanation). They are offering different evaluations of how concerning the phenomenon of invasive species is.

  2. Out of Scope: common assumption1% picked this

    Passage A questions a common assumption about a particular phenomenon, while passage B shows why

    The particular phenomenon being discussed by both passages is invasive species. Passage A isn't questioning any common assumption about invasive species. It discusses the old view of them before telling us about the new view. Passage B isn't upholding some common assumption about invasive species. If anything, passage B is debunking the common notion that invasive species are scary / worrisome.

  3. Unsupported B: usually considered11% picked this

    Passage A presents evidence that a particular phenomenon is widely considered to be undesirable, while passage B presents evidence that the same phenomenon

    This feels pretty tempting, because A is arguing that invasive species are undesirable, and B is saying "they're fiiiine. Stop it." But passage B is never presenting evidence that invasive species are usually considered beneficial. First, it's really arguing that invasive species aren't terrible, not that they are beneficial. Second, it's only speaking for itself. B isn't saying that "most people consider invasive species beneficial".

  4. Correct85% picked this

    Passage A warns about the dangers of a particular phenomenon, while passage B argues that the phenomenon should

    Why this is right

    This looks like what we wanted: Psg A: we now realize that invasive species are a huge problem Psg B: invasive species are not a huge problem; most of the time they're harmless or just change an ecosystem in ways that humans don't like but aren't inherently worse.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Passage A proposes a particular course of action, while passage B raises questions about the

    Out of Scope: proposed course of action Passage A informs us about our new understanding of invasive species as a phenomenon that profoundly affects ecosystems and threatens biodiversity around the world. But passage A never proposes a particular course of action to address this threat. And thus there's no way that B could be responding to a course of action proposed by A.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free