Reading Comprehension

PT137 · S1 · P1 · Q2 Lorenzo Tucker

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Until my present study, African American entertainer Lorenzo Tucker had not been extensively discussed in histories of United States theater and film.

Topic

Lorenzo Tucker’s contributions to African American theater and film, and the process of creating his career biography.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy (With elements of Answer / Explain—explaining the approach and challenges of the biography)

Main Point

Lorenzo Tucker was an influential but understudied figure in American entertainment, and this study uses a careful blend of oral and documentary evidence to create his career biography, thereby addressing a gap in historical scholarship. The Most Valuable Sentence: (End of P4)

P1: Introducing Tucker and His Significance

We’re told that Lorenzo Tucker made major contributions to theater and film over sixty years, yet he hasn’t received much scholarly attention. The author collected memorabilia and personal memories from Tucker himself, aiming to shed new light on a neglected corner of U.S. entertainment history.

P2: Methods and Sources for the Study

The author explains the variety of sources used to research Tucker’s life, including library archives, interviews with fellow performers, viewing Tucker’s films, and especially personal interviews with Tucker.

P3: Pros and Cons of Biographing a Living Person

Here the author discusses the benefit of being able to interview the subject directly, but also the bias and unreliability that comes with personal memory, which means careful corroboration is necessary.

2.

The author's main purpose in mentioning Tucker's collection of memorabilia (last sentence of the first paragraph) is to

  1. Correct

    indicate a source from which

    Why this is right

    This resonates with the bookend claim that comes after. It sounds somewhat like the 2nd of our predictions: - to explain half of the material that will be used to shed new light on an underserved part of US entertainment history. We can support this answer with the line "These artifacts help shed new light on a part of U.S. entertainment history about which, so far, there has been insufficient scholarship". What is "this part of U.S. entertainment history being alluded to?" It's referring to Lorenzo Tucker, as well as to the history of African American theater and film that he witnessed from the late 1920s until his death in 1986.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

  2. provide a counterexample to a

    Out of Scope: typical approaches

    There is no general claim about typical scholarly approaches to gathering data anywhere near the phrase we're being asked about.

    1% picked this

  3. justify reliance on Tucker's personal

    Doesn't Make Sense

    Our author told us that Tucker possesses tons of physical artifacts from this era of film / theater in order to justify that she would be relying on Tucker's personal memories instead? That doesn't make sense. She plans to use both his memories and this memorabilia. She says, "These artifacts, along with his memories, help shed new light". We could fix this answer by saying, "indicate, along with Tucker's personal memories, what evidence she'll be relying on".

    4% picked this

  4. give evidence of the range

    Out of Scope: nonprofessional interest

    Given that Tucker spent decades performing in and producing things for African American film / theater, he has a very professional interest in African American film / theater. His memorabilia is source material for this author's present study. It's not evidence of Tucker's accomplishments. It's just an invaluable archive of physical artifacts he amassed during his later years. And it's weird to say it relates to his nonprofessional interests when African American theater and film were his professions.

    13% picked this

  5. indicate the nature of the

    Too Strong: typically

    We have no support for the idea that in more than 50% of cases, scholars who chronicle the lives of entertainers have access to vast troves of memorabilia.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free