Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT135 S3 P4 Q27 Explanation

Confronting Agricultural Overproduction in Europe

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

As part of an international effort to address environmental problems resulting from agricultural overproduction, hundreds of thousands of acres of surplus farmland throughout Europe will be taken out of production in coming years. Restoring a natural balance of flora to this land will be difficult, however, because the nutrients in soil that of artificially accelerating the processes through which nature slowly reestablishes plant diversity on previously farmed land.

In the study, a former cornfield was raked to get rid of cornstalks and weeds, then divided into 20 plots of roughly equal size. Control plots were replanted with corn or sown with nothing at all. The remaining plots were divided into two groups: plots in one group were sown with a with fewer seed varieties. On the control plots that were left untouched, thistles have become dominant.

On some of the plots sown with seeds of native plant species, soil from nearby land that had been taken out of production 20 years earlier was scattered to see what effect introducing nematodes, fungi, and other beneficial microorganisms associated with later stages of natural soil development might have on the process microorganisms are “sown” systematically into the soil along with a wide variety of native plant seeds.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

Which one of the following is most analogous to the process, described in the last paragraph, by which the spread of

Answer choices

  1. Bad Match: switch allegiance15% picked this

    A newspaper works to prevent Party A from winning a majority of seats in the legislature by publishing editorials encouraging that party's supporters to

    "Preventing Party A from winning a majority of seats" could match up with "preventing thistles from overrunning the soil". "The newspaper working to prevent that" could be the farmer / the beneficial microorganisms? What would be the "party supporters to switch their allegiance to a rival party"? Is there something that was previously helping thistles that will now be helping the corn to grow?

  2. Correct49% picked this

    A newspaper works to prevent Party A from winning a majority of seats in the legislature by publishing editorials defending candidates from a rival

    Why this is right

    "Preventing Party A from winning a majority of seats" can match up with "preventing thistles from overrunning the soil". "The newspaper working to prevent that" could be the farmer. "Publishing editorials" can be adding the local old-school dirt that has microorganisms. "Rival party" is native plants. "Attacks by certain broadcast journalists" is the aggressive disease organisms. LSAC, do you hear how crazy this ^ sounds? This is what you're asking us to do?!! Basically, we want native plants to beat out thistle, and we know that native plants are sometimes attacked by aggressive disease organisms. So we're throwing some beneficial editorials (the beneficial microorganisms) into the mix of this election in the hopes that the effects of these editorials will cancel out the damage of the attacks from the broadcast journalists.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weaker Match: discourage supporters15% picked this

    A newspaper works to prevent Party A from winning a majority of seats in the legislature by publishing editorials intended to discourage supporters of

    "Preventing Party A from winning a majority of seats" could match up with "preventing thistles from overrunning the soil". "The newspaper working to prevent that" could be the farmer. "the editorials" can be the old-school dirt with the microorganisms. But, there's no great match for the idea that the microorganisms are "intended to discourage supporters" of thistle from showing up to vote. The beneficial microorganisms are intended to fight the aggressive disease organisms, but it's weird to call the aggressive disease organisms "supporters of thistle". It sounds like the beneficial microorganisms protect the plant roots of the corn from being attacked by the aggressive disease organisms. So "discouraging attackers of corn" is more the function of the "editorials" than is "discouraging supporters of thistle".

  4. Weaker Match: support for Party A13% picked this

    A newspaper works to prevent Party A from winning a majority of seats in the legislature by publishing editorials attacking certain public figures

    Just like (C), we get into worse-match territory with the idea of something supporting thistle, when what we're really trying to combat (the aggressive disease organisms) is something that attacks the corn. Otherwise, this answer seems better than (C), because "going after public figures who support thistles" sounds a little more like the third-party that would match up with the aggressive disease organisms, whereas (C) was using "supporters of A" which sounds more directly related to thistle itself.

  5. Bad Match: factions within party8% picked this

    A newspaper works to prevent Party A from winning a majority of seats in the legislature by publishing editorials intended to create antagonism

    This answer is saying that the corn farmer is trying to prevent thistle from dominating the soil by adding microorganisms intended to create an internal battle within the thistles. But the microorganisms aren't related to the thistle directly. They're just protecting the corn from having its roots attacked by aggressive disease organisms.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free