Lahar: We must now settle

Answer choices

1. A

   Bad Premise Match0% picked this

   rejects suggested procedures on constitutional

   She rejects two of the constitutional options by citing that one is unlikely to happen and the other has historically led to bad consequences.

   0%
2. B

   Too Strong: “every”2% picked this

   claims that one procedure is the appropriate method for reaching every decision

   She claims that one procedure, majority vote, is appropriate for meeting agendas. She never claims it’s appropriate for every decision the club makes.

   2%
3. C

   Out Of Scope1% picked this

   suggests a change to a constitution on the basis of

   Out Of Scope: “change to a constitution” She never suggests that we change the constitution. She presents the three constitutional options and picks one of them as the best option.

   1%
4. D

   Correct96% picked this

   recommends a choice based on the elimination of

   Why this is right

   Her conclusion is recommending that we go with majority vote. Her evidence, the basis for her conclusion, involved eliminating options like unaminous vote and committee.

   Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   96%
5. E

   Bad Premise Match1% picked this

   supports one preference by arguing against those who have

   She does support one preference, but the evidence doesn’t involve personally attacking people who support other options.

   1%