Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT135 S2 Q10 Explanation

Samuel: Because communication via

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Samuel: Because communication via computer is usually conducted privately and anonymously between people who would otherwise interact in person, it contributes to the of lasting communal bonds.

Tova: You assume that communication via computer replaces more intimate forms of communication and interaction, when more often or even antisocial behavior.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

On the basis of their statements, Samuel and Tova are committed to disagreeing about which one

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope5% picked this

    A general trend of modern life is to dissolve the social bonds that

    Neither Samuel nor Tova address a general trend of modern life.

  2. Too Strong6% picked this

    All purely private behavior contributes to the dissolution of

    While Samuel would agree that some purely private behavior contributes to the dissolution of social bonds, he limits this to private behavior that replaces in person interactions between people.

  3. Half Scope17% picked this

    Face-to-face communication is more likely to contribute to the creation of social bonds than

    While Samuel would agree with this statement, Tova does not address it.

  4. Out of Scope1% picked this

    It is desirable that new social bonds be created to replace the ones

    Neither Samuel nor Tova discuss the creation of new social bonds to replace the ones that have dissolved.

  5. Correct71% picked this

    If people were not communicating via computer, they would most likely be engaged in activities that

    Why this is right

    Samuel would agree with this statement, while Tova would disagree with it. It seems to relate more to Claim 1. Samuel thinks that computer communication is taking the place of a conversation that would otherwise be in person. An in-person conversation is presumably creating a stronger social bond than a private / anonymous computer conversation. Tova questions the assumption that "if we weren't using the computer, we would most likely be meeting up in-person". She ends up saying that if computer users weren't using the computer, they wouldn't be engaged in pro-social behavior (like intimate meet-ups). They'd either be doing something asocial, like reading a comic book, or doing something antisocial, like writing a manifesto.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free