Does the position of a car driver's seat

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsRole

Keep going in LSAT Lab

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Free to start

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Does the position of a car driver's seat have a significant impact on driving safety? It probably does. Driving position affects both comfort and the ability to see the road clearly. A driver who is uncomfortable eventually becomes fatigued, which makes it difficult to concentrate on the road. Likewise, the better the driver can be of road conditions and other vehicles.

What this question is testing

Role

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question

22.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the claim that driving position affects both comfort and the ability

Answer choices

Wrong Role14% picked this
It is the conclusion drawn in
The claim is the evidence used to support the conclusion, but not the conclusion itself.
14%
Wrong Role1% picked this
It is a claim that the argument shows to be inconsistent
The claim supports the conclusion, while this suggests that is is an opposing point.
1%
Out of Scope: observed phenomenon9% picked this
It is used to provide a causal explanation for an
While the claim is used to provide a causal explanation, it is not used to provide an explanation of an observed phenomenon.
9%
Wrong Role1% picked this
It describes evidence that the argument
The claim supports the conclusion, while this suggests that is is an opposing point.
1%
Correct75% picked this
It is a premise offered in support of the conclusion drawn
Why this is right
This correctly describes the role of the claim as a premise.
Skill tested: Role · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.
75%

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free