Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT134 S4 P4 Q22 Explanation

Dostoyevsky’s Position on Literature

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

During Dostoyevsky’s time there were two significant and opposing directions in Russian literary criticism. One position maintained that art stood high above the present and the everyday, while the radical view maintained that art had a right to exist only if it found its sources in concrete reality, and, through the exposure distinction in principle between fantasy and reality, and reality was far more than the merely tangible.

The radical critics’ demand that reality be depicted “as it is” was meaningless for Dostoyevsky; reality was necessarily shaped by the person who experienced it: what may not be reality for you may be reality for me. The task of the writer was to explode the boundaries of the so-called real world. be so intimately bound up with the real that one almost believes in it.”

The radical critics’ insistence that art must serve a particular political view was for Dostoyevsky the equivalent of assigning to art “a shameful destiny.” A literary work must stand or fall on its “artistic merit,” he explained. The utilitarian claim that the formal aspects of a work were of secondary importance so has fully understood the author’s thoughts. Therefore, artistry is quite simply the ability to write well.”

The radical critics’ requirement that art must at all costs be “useful” to people and society seemed to Dostoyevsky unsatisfactory. How can we know what will show itself to be useful? Can we say with assurance how useful the Iliad has been to humankind? No, Dostoyevsky believed, when it comes to this purpose because we cannot see clearly what paths it may take to become useful.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

According to the passage, Dostoyevsky disagreed with the radical critics’ view of realism in literature

Answer choices

  1. Correct79% picked this

    reality is not independent of the experiences

    Why this is right

    This is the closest match we have for the support text. It aligns with the first of our two predictions: - it's meaningless to talk about depicting reality as it is, since we all have our own private realities - our private realities also include the realm of what we fantasize about Dostoyevsky was saying that it's meaningless for radical critics to insist on depicting the REAL reality, as it is. Why? Because "reality was necessarily shaped by the person who experienced it". So right there with that line we've got Dostoyevsky objecting to the radical critics' demand about reality by saying "reality is influenced by experiences of individuals".

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Opposite, if anything4% picked this

    realism is unequal to the task of representing

    Dostoyevsky is not on board with the radical critics' insistence that art serve some political view. So he would never be saying, "Sorry, we shouldn't use realism. After all, it's not going help us achieve our important task of representing political views."

  3. Contradicted Wrong POV9% picked this

    art should be elevated above the portrayal

    This is the point of view of the "one position" in the 2nd sentence of the passage. But Dostoyevsky doesn't agree with this: As a realist, he never doubted that reality was literature's crucial source

  4. Wrong Objection2% picked this

    realism does not in fact facilitate the exposure of social inequities or contribute to the creation

    This answer is a Word Salad, designed to make us consider it because it contains words and phrases from throughout the passage. But it doesn't match anything being said in the 2nd paragraph. That's our support text. That's where Dostoyevsky objects to the radical critics' notion of reality. His objections were that "there's no objective reality; we each have our own, and it includes our sense of the fantastical". He never says, "your conception of reality sucks because reality won't solve the social problems you want literature to solve".

  5. Contradicted6% picked this

    reality is not the crucial source of

    The 4th sentence of the passage tells us that Dostoyevsky doesn't agree with this: As a realist, he never doubted that reality was literature's crucial source.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free