Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT134 S4 P4 Q21 Explanation

Dostoyevsky’s Position on Literature

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

During Dostoyevsky’s time there were two significant and opposing directions in Russian literary criticism. One position maintained that art stood high above the present and the everyday, while the radical view maintained that art had a right to exist only if it found its sources in concrete reality, and, through the exposure distinction in principle between fantasy and reality, and reality was far more than the merely tangible.

The radical critics’ demand that reality be depicted “as it is” was meaningless for Dostoyevsky; reality was necessarily shaped by the person who experienced it: what may not be reality for you may be reality for me. The task of the writer was to explode the boundaries of the so-called real world. be so intimately bound up with the real that one almost believes in it.”

The radical critics’ insistence that art must serve a particular political view was for Dostoyevsky the equivalent of assigning to art “a shameful destiny.” A literary work must stand or fall on its “artistic merit,” he explained. The utilitarian claim that the formal aspects of a work were of secondary importance so has fully understood the author’s thoughts. Therefore, artistry is quite simply the ability to write well.”

The radical critics’ requirement that art must at all costs be “useful” to people and society seemed to Dostoyevsky unsatisfactory. How can we know what will show itself to be useful? Can we say with assurance how useful the Iliad has been to humankind? No, Dostoyevsky believed, when it comes to this purpose because we cannot see clearly what paths it may take to become useful.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following works most clearly exemplifies writing Dostoyevsky would

Answer choices

  1. Wrong POV5% picked this

    a fictionalized account based on interviews with patients that illustrates the brutal

    This answer would appeal to the radical critics' point of view, because they prioritized the goal/purpose/message of a piece of writing. They'd be psyched that it's platforming the brutal facts of illness. Dostoyevsky would be asking, "Yes, but is it written well? Did the writer's talent at expressing her thoughts allow the reader to understand her fully?"

  2. Correct88% picked this

    a novel in which the author's ideas are given substance through suitable

    Why this is right

    This answer has the most language resonance with our Support Window: a novelist possesses a talent to express his thoughts in characters and images so that when the reader has finished the novel, he has fully understood the author's thoughts. "The author's ideas are given substance through characters and events" = the author expressing her thoughts in characters and images so that the reader understands her thoughts fully. And the part about the author's ideas being expressed through suitable characters and events echoes the idea of "having a talent for getting your message across".

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong POV4% picked this

    a novel in which the author attempted to use allegory to communicate a criticism

    This answer would appeal to the radical critics' point of view, because they prioritized the goal/purpose/message of a piece of writing. They'd be interested in the criticism of feudal society. Dostoyevsky would be asking, "Yes, but is it written well? Did the writer's talent at expressing her thoughts allow the reader to understand her fully?"

  4. No Match2% picked this

    an autobiographical essay in which the author chronicles the outstanding events

    This answer doesn't have anything that resonates with our definition. Dostoyevsky would be asking, "Was this essay written well? Did the writer's talent at expressing his thoughts about the events in his life allow the reader to understand him fully?"

  5. No Match0% picked this

    a short story in which the characters debate how to solve

    This answer doesn't have anything that resonates with our definition. Dostoyevsky would be asking, "Was this story written well? Did the writer successfully use the pretext of this debate to successfully convey his thoughts to the reader?"

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free