Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT133 S4 P3 Q20 Explanation

Ocean Floor Geologic Changes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsStrengthenScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Until the 1950s, most scientists believed that the geology of the ocean floor had remained essentially unchanged for many millions of years. But this idea became insupportable as new discoveries were made. First, scientists noticed that the ocean floor exhibited odd magnetic variations. Though unexpected, this was not entirely surprising, because it of the magnetite grains is “locked in,” recording the earth’s polarity at the time of cooling.

As more of the ocean floor was mapped, the magnetic variations revealed recognizable patterns, particularly in the area around the other great oceanic discovery of the 1950s: the global mid-ocean ridge, an immense submarine mountain range that winds its way around the earth much like the seams of a baseball. Alternating stripes oceanic crust. Over millions of years, this process, called ocean floor spreading, built the mid-ocean ridge.

This theory was supported by several lines of evidence. First, at or near the ridge crest, the rocks are very young, and they become progressively older away from the crest. Further, the youngest rocks all have normal polarity. Finally, because geophysicists had already determined the ages of continental volcanic rocks and, by is a remarkable correlation between the ages of the earth’s magnetic reversals and the striping pattern.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

Which one of the following would, if true, most help to support the ocean

Answer choices

  1. No Impact2% picked this

    There are types of rock other than basalt that are known to

    The existence of other rocks that have magnetite or some other magnetic component has nothing specific to do with the ocean-spreading theory.

  2. Correct64% picked this

    The ages of the earth's magnetic reversals have been verified by means other than examining

    Why this is right

    Almost none of us would be attracted to this answer on the first pass. It seems to just be signing off the on the truth of a "Premise". One of the strongest pieces of evidence for ocean-floor spreading was the "remarkable correlation" between the ages of the earth's magnetic reversals and the striping pattern found near the mid-ocean ridge. We were told that the ages of the earth's magnetic reversals "had been assigned by measuring the magnetic orientation of continental volcanic rocks, whose ages we had already determined". In other words, we had already decided how old a bunch of rocks were near a volcano on land, and those rocks have the compass needle thing that tells us whether the Earth was in normal polarity (positive North Pole / negative South Pole) or reversed polarity. So if they had a 300 million year old volcanic rock with reversed polarity and a 250 million year old volcanic rock with normal polarity, they would decide that "the earth's polarity switched between 250-300 million years ago". All this answer is saying is that cross-referenced that timeline we built with some other means to verify that our timeline of magnetic reversals was correct. By verifying our timeline, we make it a more trustworthy metric of when polarity changed, and so the "remarkable correlation" between mid-ocean stripes and the polarity timeline feels even more real than before. But this answer does nothing new. None of us were worried that the polarity timeline derived from the volcanic rocks was messed up. We had never been told it was definitely right, and now this answer is telling us it's definitely right. It's a very, very bizarre answer. It's has very little strengthening effect, but it's more than nothing, and more than every other answer, so that makes it the winner.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact13% picked this

    Pieces of basalt similar to the type found on the mid-ocean ridge have been found

    The ocean-spreading theory doesn't really care if there is basalt on land as well or only in the ocean. The only relevance of basalt is that it gives off magnetic patterns, and the magnetic patterns near the mid-ocean ridge seem to line up with reversals in earth's magnetic polarity.

  4. No Impact14% picked this

    Along its length, the peak of the mid-ocean ridge varies greatly in height above

    The ocean-floor spreading theory doesn't really make any predictions about whether ridge height would vary greatly or only slightly. Every mountain range on earth varies greatly in terms of height above sea level, so we'd expect an underwater mountain range to vary greatly as well (whether that mountain range was still currently changing or pretty much settled in place). You know mountains -- they love their peaks and valleys, which vary greatly in height.

  5. No Impact8% picked this

    Basalt is the only type of volcanic rock found in portions of the ocean floor

    The ocean-spreading theory doesn't really care where on Earth there is or isn't basalt. It doesn't care whether near the continents there are portions of only-basalt, or whether basalt is always mixed in rather evenly. The only relevance of basalt to this theory is that it gives off magnetic patterns, and the magnetic patterns it gives off near the mid-ocean ridge seem to line up with reversals in earth's magnetic polarity. Whatever basalt is doing on the continents, in (C), or near the continents, in this answer, doesn't really have anything to do with analyzing the mid-ocean ridge and interpreting whether it's fixed or spreading.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free