Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT133 S3 Q26 Explanation

A recent poll showed that almost half

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A recent poll showed that almost half of the city's residents believe that Mayor Walker is guilty of ethics violations. Surprisingly, however, 52 percent of those surveyed judged Walker's performance as mayor to be good or excellent, before anyone accused him of ethics violations.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising

Answer choices

  1. Correct59% picked this

    Almost all of the people who believe that Walker is guilty of ethics violations had thought, even before he was accused of those violations,

    Why this is right

    This connects those who disapprove of the mayor’s performance with those who believe he is guilty of ethics violations.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope8% picked this

    In the time since Walker was accused of ethics violations, there has been an increase in the percentage of city residents who judge the

    The performance of the mayor’s political opponents is not relevant to how city resident’s judge the mayor’s performance.

  3. Deepens the Paradox13% picked this

    About a fifth of those polled did not know that Walker had been accused

    If 20 percent did not know the mayor had been accused and almost 50 percent believe the mayor is guilty of ethics violations, then that means that only 30 percent believe that he is not guilty of ethics violations. So where does the mayor’s 52 percent support come from?

  4. Deepens the Paradox2% picked this

    Walker is currently up for reelection, and anticorruption groups in the city have expressed support

    This makes the mayor’s support all the more surprising.

  5. Too Weak19% picked this

    Walker has defended himself against the accusations by arguing that the alleged ethics violations were the result of honest

    This does not indicate how the city’s residents have responded to the mayor’s defense.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free