Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT133 S3 Q21 Explanation

Chemist: The molecules

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Chemist: The molecules of a certain weed-killer are always present in two forms, one the mirror image of the other. One form of the molecule kills weeds, while the other has no effect on them. As a result, the effectiveness of the weed- killer in a given situation is heavily influenced by other. Thus, much of the data on the effects of this weed-killer are probably misleading.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact On Conclusion4% picked this

    In general, if the molecules of a weed-killer are always present in two forms, then it is likely that weeds are killed by one

    This tells us nothing about where any of our data on the effectiveness comes from, whether they studied a wide or narrow range of local soil conditions.

  2. Correct61% picked this

    Almost all of the data on the effects of the weed-killer are drawn from laboratory studies in which both forms of the weed-killer's molecules

    Why this is right

    This addresses our new guy "the data" head-on. It sounds like this weed-killer has been tested in artificial lab conditions, in which neither molecule is the predominant one. We learned that local soil conditions will usually favor the breakdown of one form of molecule or the other, leaving the remaining one as the dominant one that's more concentrated in the soil. If most of the time actual soil is imbalanced (there's either more of form 1 or form 2), but almost all the data is based on lab soil that is equally form 1 and form 2, then this would support the idea that our data is probably giving us a misleading sense of how effective the weed killer will be in actual conditions.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Unclear Impact7% picked this

    Of the two forms of the weed-killer's molecules, the one that kills weeds is found in most local soil conditions to

    Without knowing whether the data we have for this weed killer was based on soil where the killer form is present or soil where the non-killer form is present, we can't tell whether this is misleading. If most of our testing data was on soil where the killer-form is more concentrated, then our data should match up with reality most of the time. If most of our testing data was on soil where the non-killer form is more concentrated, then our data is probably misleading.

  4. Opposite13% picked this

    The data on the effects of the weed-killer are drawn from studies of the weed-killer under a variety of soil conditions similar to those

    This would weaken the argument and make our data sound pretty trustworthy, since it takes into account the variety of soil conditions.

  5. Unclear Impact14% picked this

    Data on the weed-killer's effects that rely solely on the examination of the effects of only one of the two forms of the weed-killer's

    This discusses a certain scenario under which we would receive misleading data (if the data is based on examining only one of the two forms of molecule). But we don't know if "much of the data" is examining only one of two forms, so this answer doesn't seem useful until we know whether any of the data has actually been compiled by studying solely one form.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free