Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT133 S3 Q22 Explanation

Principle: A police officer is eligible

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Principle: A police officer is eligible for a Mayor's Commendation if the officer has an exemplary record, but not otherwise; an officer eligible for the award who did something this year that exceeded what could be reasonably expected award if the act saved someone's life.

Conclusion: Officer Franklin should receive a Mayor's Commendation but Officer not.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

From which one of the following sets of facts can the conclusion be properly drawn

Answer choices

  1. Correct57% picked this

    In saving a child from drowning this year, Franklin and Penn both risked their lives beyond what could be reasonably expected of a police

    Why this is right

    We know that Franklin has the exemplary record and went beyond expectations to save someone's life, which gets him the Mayor's Commendation. We know Penn does not have an exemplary record an thus is not eligible for the Mayor's Commendation.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Half Scope19% picked this

    Both Franklin and Penn have exemplary records, and each officer saved a child from drowning earlier this year. However, in doing so, Franklin went

    This successfully establishes that Franklin should get the Mayor's Commendation. However, it doesn't give a clear reason for denying Penn. In the case of the drowning child, Penn didn't go beyond expectation to save a life. But maybe he did do that sort of thing at some other point this year (didn't save them from drowning but from getting hit by a bus). Also, our rule allows us to prove you should get the MC, but that doesn't mean if you haven't gone beyond expectations to save a life that you shouldn't get the Mayor's Commendation.

  3. Half Scope4% picked this

    Neither Franklin nor Penn has an exemplary record. But, in saving the life of an accident victim, Franklin went beyond what could be reasonably

    Since neither has an exemplary record, neither of them is eligible for the Mayor's Commendation. That proves that Penn shouldn't get it, but it also proves that Franklin shouldn't get it, regardless of his heroism.

  4. Unknown Exemplary Record5% picked this

    At least once this year, Franklin has saved a person's life in such a way as to exceed what could be reasonably expected of

    Without telling us whether Franklin and Penn have exemplary records, we don't even know if they're eligible for the Mayor's Commendation.

  5. Unclear Impact15% picked this

    Both Franklin and Penn have exemplary records. On several occasions this year Franklin has saved people's lives, and on many occasions this year Franklin

    We don't know whether Franklin's life-saving behavior and his going-beyond-expectations behavior ever overlapped. If I say, "On several occasions I have seen President Trump speak and on several occasions I have been to Trader Joes', that doesn't indicate whether I have ever seen President Trump speak at a Trader Joe's. Since we don't know if Franklin did more than expected while saving a life, we can't trigger the rule that says he should get the Mayor's Commendation.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free