Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT133 S3 Q10 Explanation

Editorial: Many critics of consumerism

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Editorial: Many critics of consumerism insist that advertising persuades people that they need certain consumer goods when they merely desire them. However, this accusation rests on a fuzzy distinction, that between wants and needs. In life, it is often impossible or whether it is essential to one's happiness.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in

Answer choices

  1. Correct88% picked this

    The claim that advertising persuades people that they need things that they merely want rests

    Why this is right

    This best paraphrases the argument’s main point.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unsupported5% picked this

    Many critics of consumerism insist that advertising attempts to blur people's ability to distinguish between

    While critics of consumerism insist that advertising persuades people that they need certain consumer goods, it does not attempt to blur people’s ability to distinguish between wants and needs.

  3. Unsupported0% picked this

    There is nothing wrong with advertising that tries to persuade people that they need

    This point is not made in the argument.

  4. Unsupported2% picked this

    Many critics of consumerism fail to realize that certain things are essential

    This point is not made in the argument.

  5. Too Strong5% picked this

    Critics of consumerism often use fuzzy distinctions to support

    The main point of the argument is that critics used a fuzzy distinction to support their claim in this case. However, that does not mean that critics of consumerism often use fuzzy distinctions.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free