Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT132 S4 Q12 Explanation

Political scientist: It is not uncommon

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Political scientist: It is not uncommon for a politician to criticize his or her political opponents by claiming that their exposition of their ideas is muddled and incomprehensible. Such criticism, however, is never sincere. Political agendas promoted in a manner that cannot be understood by large numbers every politician knows, political mobilization requires commonality of purpose.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following is the most accurate rendering of the political

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope4% picked this

    People who promote political agendas in an incomprehensible manner should be

    It is the critics that claim their opponents are incomprehensible who should be regarded as insincere.

  2. Out of Scope2% picked this

    Sincere critics of the proponents of a political agenda should not focus their criticisms on the manner in

    The passage is not about what sincere critics should do, but rather about which critics are being insincere.

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    The ineffectiveness of a confusingly promoted political agenda is a reason for refraining from, rather than engaging in, criticism of

    The argument is not about the reasons to criticize or refrain from criticizing, but rather about which critics are being insincere.

  4. Correct85% picked this

    A politician criticizing his or her political opponents for presenting their political agendas in an incomprehensible

    Why this is right

    This best paraphrases the political scientist’s conclusion.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Assumption6% picked this

    To mobilize large numbers of people in support of a political agenda, that political agenda must be presented in such a way

    This is an assumption of the intermediate argument.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free