Logical Reasoning

PT132 · S2 · Q15 Speaker: Like many contemporary

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Speaker: Like many contemporary critics, Smith argues that the true meaning of an author's statements can be understood only through insight into the author's social circumstances.

Evidence

The true meaning of an author’s TM → IASC statements can be understood only through insight into the author’s social circumstances.

Conclusion

Smith herself is not aware of ~TM the true meaning of her own words.

Evaluate

The speaker assumes that ~IASC Smith herself lacks insight into the her own social circumstances.

15.

The speaker's main conclusion logically follows if which one of the following is assumed?

  1. Insight into the intended meaning

    Out of Scope

    Insight into the intended meaning of an author’s work is not relevant to the argument.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    Smith lacks insight into her

    Why this is right

    This triggers the rule argued for by Smith that the true meaning of an author’s statements can be understood only through insight into the author’s social circumstances.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

  3. There is just one meaning

    Out of Scope

    The meaning intended by Smith is not relevant to the argument.

    3% picked this

  4. Smith's theory about the relation

    Term Shift

    It is not Smith’s theory that lacks insight, but rather the application of that theory that lacks insight. The speaker assumes that Smith lacks insight into her own social circumstances.

    10% picked this

  5. The intended meaning of an

    Out of Scope

    Insight into the intended meaning of an author’s work is not relevant to the argument.

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free