Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT132 S2 Q14 Explanation

Music professor: Because rap

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Music professor: Because rap musicians can work alone in a recording studio, they need not accommodate supporting musicians' wishes. Further, learning to rap is not as formal a process as learning extremely individualistic and nontraditional musical form.

Music critic: But rap appeals to tradition by using bits of older songs. Besides, the themes and styles of rap have developed into a tradition. And successful rap musicians do not perform to the preferences of the public.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The music critic's response to the music

Answer choices

  1. Trap6% picked this

    challenges it by offering evidence against one of the stated premises on which its conclusion concerning

    Goes After Both Parts of the Conclusion Attacks Assumptions, Not Evidence This critic tackled the rationale for individualistic and nontraditional, so this is wrong in terms of saying it went "against one". But it's also pretty much never the case anything on LSAT goes against the the truth of the evidence presented. We go after its force, its relevance, its trustworthiness, but not its truth. The critic didn't say, "Rappers are working with other musicians in the studio, or rappers are learning musical instruments."

  2. Correct73% picked this

    challenges its conclusion concerning rap music by offering certain additional observations that the music professor does not take

    Why this is right

    The additional observations brought up by the critic suggest that rappers aren't just trying to please themselves and aren't operating outside of a traditional art form.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Doesn't Generalize6% picked this

    challenges the grounds on which the music professor generalizes from the particular context of rap music to the broader context

    The professor doesn't go from talking about rap in his premise to not talking about rap in his conclusion. There's no generalization. The author just argues, "Because these facts are true about rap, these qualities are apt in describing rap."

  4. No Alternative Explanations2% picked this

    challenges it by offering an alternative explanation of phenomena that the music professor cites as evidence for his

    The professor didn't present any phenomenon in need of an explanation. He described aspects of the phenomenon of creating rap music, but he never offered an explanation for why that happens. His conclusion sounds more like a result what is said in the premise. And the critic certainly isn't presenting alternative storylines for something that happened / is happening. She is just bringing up other true facts about rap music. We don't hear the critic saying, "The REAL reason that rap musicians are alone in the studio is _______. The REAL reason they don't learn an instrument is _______ ."

  5. Bad Evidence Match14% picked this

    challenges each of a group of claims about tradition and individuality in music that the music professor gives

    The music professor concludes something about individuality and tradition, but there is nothing about those things in his evidence. There certainly isn't a group of claims about tradition and individuality in the professor's evidence.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free