Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT131 S4 P3 Q16 Explanation

Sculptor Isamu Noguchi

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi (1904-1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions. He might well have become a scientist within a standard scientific discipline, but he instead became an artist who repeatedly veered off at wide angles from the well-known courses followed by conventionally talented artists behind one particular sculpture typifies this aspect of his creativeness.

By his early twenties, Noguchi's sculptures showed such exquisite comprehension of human anatomy and deft conceptual realization that he won a Guggenheim Fellowship for travel in Europe. After arriving in Paris in 1927, Noguchi asked the Romanian-born sculptor Constantin Brancusi if he might become his student. When Brancusi said no, that he metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold, could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections.

Noguchi wanted to create a sculpture that was purely reflective. In 1929, after returning to the United States, he met the architect and philosopher R. Buckminster Fuller, offering to sculpt a portrait of him. When Fuller heard of Noguchi's ideas regarding positive-light sculpture, he suggested using chrome-nickel steel, which Henry Ford, through Here, finally, was a permanently reflective surface, economically available in massive quantities.

In sculpting his portrait of Fuller, Noguchi did not think of it as merely a shiny alternate model of traditional, negative-light sculptures. What he saw was that completely reflective surfaces provided a fundamental invisibility of surface like that of utterly still waters, whose presence can be apprehended only when objects—a ship's mast, The viewer's awareness of the "invisible" sculpture's presence and dimensional relationships would be derived only secondarily.

Even after this stunning discovery, Noguchi remained faithful to his inquisitive nature. At the moment when his explorations had won critical recognition of the genius of his original and the next phase of his evolution.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Topic

The author is telling a portrait story about the sculptor Isamu Noguchi — and what made his creative process distinctive.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't arguing against anyone — they're celebrating Noguchi's habit of asking original questions.

Main Point

The simpler version: Noguchi could have been a scientist, and he brought a scientist's habit of mind to sculpture. He noticed that for thousands of years sculptors had been working with shadows because no shiny material was reliable. When chrome-nickel steel became available in the 1920s, he made fully reflective sculptures — and realized those surfaces don't just reflect, they go invisible, like still water. Then, when everyone was praising him, he moved on to whatever was next.

P1: Who Noguchi was

Someone who asked unusual questions and came at sculpture from odd angles.

P2: The first big realization

Working as Brancusi's stonecutter and polisher in Paris, Noguchi noticed something: every sculptor had always worked with shadows. Why? Because no metal except gold reflected light reliably. So sculptors had been forced into "negative light" by a material limitation — not by aesthetic choice.

P3: The right material appears

Buckminster Fuller pointed Noguchi to chrome-nickel steel — a new material from Henry Ford's automotive research that was permanently reflective and affordable in bulk. The material limit was gone.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

In saying that “no metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold, could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections” (second paragraph), the author

Answer choices

  1. Half Scope10% picked this

    a metal that can be made moderately reflective in any sculptural application and metals that can be made highly reflective

    Gold can be made moderately reflective (even highly reflective), but bronze and brass are not described as able to be made highly reflective only in certain applications.

  2. Unsupported Relationship / Contradiction25% picked this

    a naturally highly reflective metal that was technically suited for sculpture and other highly reflective metals that

    The passage does not indicate whether gold is technically suited for sculpture, but since it’s expensive, one might suspect that it’s not. Furthermore, bronze and brass cannot be counted on to remain highly reflective and yet they are suited for sculpture (second paragraph).

  3. Correct53% picked this

    metals that can be made highly reflective but lose their reflective properties over time and a metal that does not

    Why this is right

    Metals that cannot be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections are ones that can be made highly reflective but lose their reflective properties over time, while nonoxidizing gold does not similarly lose its reflective properties. The end of the 2nd paragraph helps emphasize this by referring to chrome-nickel steel's magic: it has gold's same "permanently reflective" quality!

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Contradiction6% picked this

    a highly reflective sculptural material that, because it is a metal, is long lasting and nonmetallic materials that

    While gold is a highly reflective sculptural material, bronze and brass are metallic materials.

  5. Unsupported Relationship7% picked this

    a highly reflective metal that was acceptable to both traditional and modern sculptors and highly reflective metals whose use

    The passage does not indicate that the use of bronze and brass was purely experimental.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free