Reading Comprehension

PT131 · S4 · P2 · Q14 Statutory Law

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A proficiency in understanding, applying, and even formulating statutes—the actual texts of laws enacted by legislative bodies—is a vital aspect of the practice of law, but statutory law is often given too little attention by law schools.

Topic

Statutory law and why law schools should emphasize it more in legal education.

Framework

Challenge Position (the author pushes back against the way most law schools under-emphasize statutory law)

Main Point

Law schools focus too much on judicial decisions and case analysis, often neglecting statutory law, but developing skills related to statutes is essential for legal practice, making statutory law a crucial part of legal education even if statutes differ regionally. (The Most Valuable Sentence for the main point appears at the end of the first paragraph and is fleshed out in the final sentence of the passage.)

P1: Law School’s Emphasis on Judicial Decisions

Many law schools tend to focus their teaching on analyzing past court cases, which can give students the wrong impression that legal practice is mostly about interpreting case law rather than directly using or understanding statutes (laws written by legislatures).

P2: The Importance of Statutes in Legal Practice

In real legal work, lawyers often need to consult statutes directly to answer clients’ questions, and while sometimes using statutes is straightforward, accurately interpreting them when things aren’t clear is a vital legal skill.

P3: Teaching Statutory Law Develops Synthesis Skills

Teaching statutory law helps students become better at seeing how different laws fit together as a whole, rather than just analyzing one case at a time—a valuable ability, especially since most law students eventually specialize.

14.

The information in the passage suggests that the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements regarding training in statutory law?

  1. While nationally oriented law schools

    Unsupported

    Out of Scope (deficient in case law) Nothing in the passage says or suggests that regional schools are deficient in teaching case law. This answer is trying to make it seem like a zero sum battle between case law and statutory law, and then make it seem like national schools are good at one / bad at the other, while regional schools are good / bad in reverse.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    Training in statutory law would

    Why this is right

    The second paragraph says statutes' meanings and applicability "are not always so obvious," and that this is one reason the ability to interpret statutes accurately is an essential skill to learn. Training in statutory law is what builds that skill. The first sentence of P3 begins, "Another skill that teaching statutory law would improve is synthesis". That sentence is indicating that the previous sentence, about learning to interpret statutes whose meanings and applicability is not immediately obvious, was also a skill that teaching statutory law would improve.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

  3. Lawyers who are trained in

    Unsupported Comparison

    The passage treats case analysis and statutory skill as different abilities. It never claims statutory training makes lawyers better at handling the details of past cases.

    7% picked this

  4. Courses in statutory law are

    Contradicted

    The third paragraph recommends studying all the statutes "in a certain small area of the law" to build synthesis, and the fourth says skills from mastering a particular region's statutes transfer. A narrow focus is the author's preferred approach.

    3% picked this

  5. Lawyers who do not specialize

    Contradicted

    The first sentence calls statutory proficiency "a vital aspect of the practice of law" for lawyers generally. Specialization makes synthesis "especially important," but it's too far to say the author would say the other lawyers "probably have little need for it". This whole passage is written to agitate for (all) law schools to teach more statutory law. So it doesn't really align with the author's stance to diminish its value for a big group of lawyers.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free