Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT131 S3 Q1 Explanation

New technologies that promise

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

New technologies that promise to extend life and decrease pain involve innovations that require extensive scientific research. Therefore, investment in such technologies is very risky, because innovations requiring extensive scientific research also require large amounts of capital but are unlikely to are willing to invest in these new technologies.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why some people are willing to invest in new technologies that promise to

Answer choices

  1. Correct93% picked this

    When investments in new technologies that promise to extend life and decrease pain do provide financial return, they generally return many times the original

    Why this is right

    This gives us a reason that people would invest in life extending/saving technologies. As our common sense may have expected: high risk, high reward. These investments are like recording contracts for musicians in the 70s/80s/90s: most of the bands that got signed never paid back all the money spent on recording and promoting them, but a few of those signed artists would blow up and reap the record company millions in profits.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. No Impact Reinforces Background2% picked this

    A large variety of new technologies that promise to extend life and decrease pain have been developed

    Yes, we know that people are investing in these technologies, so presumably some of them have materialized into actual new technologies. But this doesn't answer the question of why investors are willing to gamble lots of up front money on a low probability of return.

  3. Out of Scope: "certain other technologies"2% picked this

    The development of certain new technologies other than those that promise to extend life and decrease pain is also very risky, because these technologies

    If this answer said that "all new technologies involve lots of upfront capital and a likelihood that you won't get any financial return from it", then it could act as a reason why people invest in life saving/extending technologies -- sure they're a gamble, but everything's a gamble. But this answer is only saying "there are some other investments that are also risky like this investment is". That doesn't provide a reason why investors are willing to take this risk.

  4. Too Weak1% picked this

    Some investments that initially seem likely to provide reasonably large financial return ultimately provide

    According to this answer, people are willing make this risky life-tech investment that is unlikely to provide a financial return, because investments that are likely to provide a return sometimes fail to do so. That's too weak. "Some" means at least one. We know that when we use words like "likely" and "unlikely" that there will be exceptions to the trend, so it changes nothing to know that "sometimes, less-risky investments don't pan out".

  5. Out of Scope1% picked this

    The scientific research necessary to develop new technologies that promise to extend life and decrease pain sometimes leads to no greater

    Out of Scope: "greater understanding of the world" This doesn't come close to giving us a reason why people are willing to invest in life-tech, because this says that investments in life-tech do not always lead to something positive. Also, a greater understanding of the world is probably not on the mind of an investor, so that concept would be tough to utilize in terms of explaining an investor's behavior.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free