Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT131 S1 Q24 Explanation

The supernova event of 1987

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The supernova event of 1987 is interesting in that there is still no evidence of the neutron star that current theory says should have remained after a supernova of that size. This is in spite of the fact that many of the most sensitive instruments ever developed have searched for the tell-tale in claiming that supernovas of a certain size always produce neutron stars.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens

Answer choices

  1. Weaken7% picked this

    Most supernova remnants that astronomers have detected have a neutron

    This makes it more likely that supernova produce neutron stars.

  2. Correct65% picked this

    Sensitive astronomical instruments have detected neutron stars much farther away than the location of

    Why this is right

    This defends the argument from the possibility that the instruments are not strong enough to detect the neutron star.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope6% picked this

    The supernova of 1987 was the first that scientists were able to

    Whether the supernova event of 1987 was the first, second, or last that scientists were able to observe is not relevant to the argument.

  4. Weaken5% picked this

    Several important features of the 1987 supernova are correctly predicted by

    This defends the current theory against the argument’s attack.

  5. Too Weak17% picked this

    Some neutron stars are known to have come into existence by a cause other than

    This is consistent with the possibility that some neutron stars came into existence by a supernova explosion.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free