Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT130 S3 Q5 Explanation

Motor oil serves to lubricate engines

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Motor oil serves to lubricate engines and thus retard engine wear. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of various brands of motor oil by using them in taxicabs over a 6,000-mile test period. All the oils did equally well in retarding wear on pistons Hence, cheaper brands of oil are the best buys.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens

Answer choices

  1. Opposite1% picked this

    Cheaper brands of motor oil are often used by knowledgeable automobile mechanics for

    This strengthens the argument, by saying that potential experts in the field of motor oil agree with the author.

  2. Too Weak8% picked this

    Tests other than of the ability to reduce engine wear also can reliably gauge the

    The key word also takes any punch out of this one. If the test we did was a reliable way to gauge the quality of motor oil, then it doesn’t matter that there are other reliable ways. Reliable ways will tend to all arrive at the same conclusion.

  3. Applies to Both4% picked this

    The lubricating properties of all motor oils deteriorate over time, and the rate of deterioration

    Since this fact applies to all motor oils, it is useless to our goal of highlighting some advantage of using the pricier motor oils.

  4. Unclear Impact / Too Weak6% picked this

    The engines of some individual cars that have had their oil changed every 3,000 miles, using only a certain brand of oil,

    This is too weak to be correct, as it applies to “at least one” individual car. But this answer also doesn’t specify whether we’re talking about a cheaper or pricier oil, so it’s impact is doomed to be unclear.

  5. Correct80% picked this

    Ability to retard engine wear is not the only property of motor oil important to the

    Why this is right

    If there are other important properties of motor oil besides retarding wear, then we can’t judge various brands of oil by looking only at how they retard wear. This opens the door for a line of objection such as, “Sure the cheaper brands are just as good at retarding engine wear. But the more expensive brands are better at doing X, which is also important to the running of an engine.”

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free