Reading Comprehension

PT130 · S2 · P2 · Q10 Philip Emeagwali

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

This passage was adapted from articles published in the 1990s.

Topic

Philip Emeagwali’s breakthroughs in computer design by modeling network systems after patterns found in nature.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Emeagwali achieved major advances in parallel computing by designing computer systems inspired by natural processes like tree branching and honeycombs, and he believes this nature-inspired approach will shape the future of technology. (Most Valuable Sentence: Appears at the end of the final paragraph—)

P1: Emeagwali’s Early Breakthrough—Parallel Computers Inspired by Nature

In the 1980s, Emeagwali pioneered the use of massively parallel computers that could solve tough problems like modeling oil flow, showing that using lots of computers working together (inspired by nature) was way faster and more effective than traditional supercomputers operating one step at a time.

P2: How Nature’s Structures Inspired an Efficient Solution

To handle extremely complicated calculations needed for oil flow modeling, Emeagwali connected over 65,000 computers via the Internet and used the idea of how trees branch out efficiently to guide how the network shared tasks—showing that copying nature’s branching patterns led to a breakthrough in how parallel computing could work.

P3: Applying Nature’s Patterns Further—Honeycomb Computers and the Future

In 1996, Emeagwali designed a new computer system (this time modeled after the hexagonal structure of bee honeycombs) that he claims could predict weather far into the future. He argues that future discoveries in technology will come from imitating nature’s efficient designs.

10.

The passage most strongly suggests that Emeagwali holds which one of the following views?

  1. Correct

    Some natural systems have arrived

    Why this is right

    This seems to nicely echo the sentiments in our Support Window, the final two sentences of the passage. He thinks that nature can provide "elegant (efficient) solutions to our complex technical problems". He thinks that better understanding how natural systems have solved certain problems will thereby facilitate computer scientists to find solutions to the problems they're facing. This answer is also lovably weak -- some natural systems are meaningfully analogous.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    81% picked this

  2. Global weather is likely too

    Contradicted

    Not only does this not look appealing at first blush, because it's not addressing the concepts from our Support Window, but it actually seems contradicted by the first sentence of the final paragraph. There, Emeagwali is claiming that parallel computers will be powerful enough to predict global weather a century in advance.

    0% picked this

  3. Most computer designs will in

    Too Strong: most

    Ah, the ol' answer killer "most" (and its family ... usually, generally, typically, tends to). Emeagwali thinks that computer scientists will increasingly look to natural systems for inspiration, but that could mean they're going from being inspired by natural systems 10% of the time to being inspired by natural systems 25% of the time. He hasn't committed to the view that over 50% of computer designs will be inspired by nature.

    12% picked this

  4. Massively parallel computers will eventually

    Out of Scope: mundane tasks

    We don't have any line reference to justify the idea that we'll use a massively parallel computer to make a PowerPoint presentation.

    2% picked this

  5. The mathematical structure of branching

    Too Strong: primarily

    If we got read of "primarily" then this answer choice is great, but Emeagwali has never gone out on a limb (ooh, no pun intended) and said that the #1 usefulness of the math of tree branching is for predicting oil flow.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free