Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT130 S1 Q21 Explanation

Columnist: Although there is

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Columnist: Although there is and should be complete freedom of thought and expression, that does not mean that there is nothing wrong with exploiting the sake of financial gain.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following judgments conforms most closely to the principle cited

Answer choices

  1. Half Scope2% picked this

    The government should grant artists the right to create whatever works of art they want to create so long as no one

    This has the "let them do X" part, but not the part about "scorn them for making money off people's depraved tastes".

  2. Half Scope7% picked this

    People who produce depraved movies have the freedom to do so, but that means that they also have the freedom

    This has the "let them do X" part, but not the part about "scorn them for making money off people's depraved tastes". (For a second there, I thought I had accidentally predicted the topic of the correct answer!)

  3. Correct76% picked this

    There should be no laws restricting what books are published, but publishing books that pander to people with depraved tastes

    Why this is right

    This combines both things we wanted: you're free to do it, but we can still scold you for doing it.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Opposite13% picked this

    The public has the freedom to purchase whatever recordings are produced, but that does not mean that the government may not limit the production

    If the government can limit was sort of recordings are produced, then we haven't achieved the "complete freedom of expression" the principle discussed. In addition, this answer doesn't have the 2nd ingredient, which says that "we can still say that what you did was wrong, even though you're free to do it".

  5. Opposite3% picked this

    One who advocates complete freedom of speech should not criticize others for saying things that he or she

    This starts off bad because it's talking about people who advocate complete freedom of speech, when the principle is not about advocates of freedom, it's about there actually being freedom. The 2nd ingredient is drifting towards the opposite, saying that we should not criticize depraved things. The principle says we can still criticize people for trying to make money off depraved things.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free