Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT129 S1 Q24 Explanation

Columnist: The amount of acidic pollutants

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Columnist: The amount of acidic pollutants released into the air has decreased throughout the world over the last several decades. We can expect, then, an overall decrease in the negative environmental caused by these acidic pollutants.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the columnist's

Answer choices

  1. Correct60% picked this

    Some ecosystems have developed sophisticated mechanisms that reduce the negative effects of increased levels of

    Why this is right

    This is the opposite of what we want. It sounds like there might be less damage.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Weakens10% picked this

    The amount of acid-neutralizing buffers released into the air has decreased

    Even though we’re releasing less pollutants, the damage could be the same/worse because the protective shields are weaker than before.

  3. Weakens11% picked this

    The current decrease in acidic pollutants is expected to end soon, as more countries turn to coal for

    Countries will soon be releasing more pollutants than they currently are, so the damage is likely to be the same/worse.

  4. Weakens10% picked this

    The effects of acid rain are cumulative and largely independent of current

    The more acid rain you add, the worse the damage becomes. It’s kind of like if you stabbed me five times with a big knife, and now you start stabbing me with a smaller knife – even though the current attacks are smaller, you are still adding damage and possibly going to cause my death. Not to mention, I’m still bleeding from those previous wounds. Your milder attacks haven’t done anything to repair the damage you already started.

  5. Weakens9% picked this

    The soils of many ecosystems exposed to acid rain have been exhausted of minerals that help protect them

    Just like choice B, even though we’re releasing less pollutants, the damage could be the same/worse because the protective shields are weaker than before.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free